Re: Issues in vim 8.1, patches 1-897

Robert Webb wrote: > Hi Christian & Bram, > > I'm including images below, so I thought it better to write directly rather > than bothering the whole mailing list about it. That apparently happened anyway, but I haven't heard complaints about larger emails recently, thus it's fine. > I couldn

Re: Issues in vim 8.1, patches 1-897

Hi Christian & Bram, I'm including images below, so I thought it better to write directly rather than bothering the whole mailing list about it. I couldn't see how to generate a single patch for three submits in TortoiseGit, but I've listed all three patches again below which I think should be su

[patch] Remove __CYGWIN32__

Hi, When __CYGWIN32__ is defined, __CYGWIN__ is also defined. So, `defined(__CYGWIN__) || defined(__CYGWIN32__)` is redundant. This patch removes __CYGWIN32__ from some part. Regards, Ken Takata -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply belo

[patch][win32] Remove MSWIN from winclip.c

Hi, In winclip.c, WIN3264 was used to distinguish Win32 from Win16. However, we have already dropped support for Win16, so we can remove the MSWIN macro from winclip.c Regards, Ken Takata -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the te