Hi,
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 1:20 PM Andy Massimino
wrote:
>
> I noticed simplify_filename() is used by findfile.c and elsewhere, but
> resides in tag.c. Probably should be put into findfile.c instead.
>
Currently all the functions related to FEAT_SEARCHPATH and
FEAT_PATH_EXTRA feature macros are
After applying patches (8.1.) 953 to 956 I get the following warning
in Tiny and Small builds (only):
gcc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -O2 -fno-strength-reduce -Wall
-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=1-o objects/ex_cmds.o
ex_cmds.c
ex_cmds.c: In function ‘ex_sort’:
ex_cmds.c:557:43
Patch 8.1.0956
Problem:Using context:0 in 'diffopt' does not work well.
Solution: Make zero context do the same as one line context. (closes #4005)
Files: src/diff.c, src/testdir/test_diffmode.vim,
src/testdir/dumps/Test_diff_06.0.dump,
src/testdir/dumps/Test_di
Patch 8.1.0955
Problem:Matchit autoload directory not in installer. (Chris Morgan)
Solution: Adjust the NSIS script. (Christian Brabandt, closes #4006)
Files: nsis/gvim.nsi
*** ../vim-8.1.0954/nsis/gvim.nsi 2018-12-21 17:59:30.100109769 +0100
--- nsis/gvim.nsi 2019-02-19
Patch 8.1.0954
Problem:Arguments of semsg() and siemsg() are not checked.
Solution: Add function prototype with __attribute__.
Files: src/message.c, src/proto/message.pro, src/proto.h
*** ../vim-8.1.0953/src/message.c 2019-02-17 17:44:36.215875493 +0100
--- src/message.c
Patch 8.1.0953
Problem:A very long file is truncated at 2^31 lines.
Solution: Use LONG_MAX for MAXLNUM. (Dominique Pelle, closes #4011)
Files: src/vim.h
*** ../vim-8.1.0952/src/vim.h 2019-02-18 21:41:34.477750367 +0100
--- src/vim.h 2019-02-19 21:24:24.887720755 +0100
***
Hi Christian,
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 9:16 AM Christian Brabandt wrote:
>
> Am 2019-02-19 14:37, schrieb Robert Webb:
> > Language Server Protocol for Vim looks like what I really want,
> > thanks! This would supersede my SmartTag patch (at the expense of
> > being far more complicated).
> >
> >
On 2/19/19 12:16 PM, Christian Brabandt wrote:
Does that mean we can drop the patch in favor of a an existing LSP
integration with Vim?
I think a tagfunc (or some other programmatic hook into tags) is still
necessary to have proper LSP integration. Current LSP plugins do not
work natively
Am 2019-02-19 14:37, schrieb Robert Webb:
Language Server Protocol for Vim looks like what I really want,
thanks! This would supersede my SmartTag patch (at the expense of
being far more complicated).
But I'm on Windows and there don't seem to be any servers ready
compiled for use. Nor do they
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 8:18 AM Yegappan Lakshmanan wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 5:38 AM Robert Webb wrote:
> >
> > Language Server Protocol for Vim looks like what I really want, thanks!
> > This
> > would supersede my SmartTag patch (at the expense of being far more
> > complicated
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 5:38 AM Robert Webb wrote:
>
> Language Server Protocol for Vim looks like what I really want, thanks! This
> would supersede my SmartTag patch (at the expense of being far more
> complicated).
>
> But I'm on Windows and there don't seem to be any servers ready compil
Hi,
2018/10/8 Mon 10:50:46 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2016/2/2 Tue 7:11:32 UTC+9 Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> > Ken Takata wrote:
> >
> > > When 'enc' is utf-8, executable() may fail on very long filename which is
> > > longer than _MAX_PATH bytes in UTF-8 and shorter than _MAX_PATH character
Language Server Protocol for Vim looks like what I really want, thanks!
This would supersede my SmartTag patch (at the expense of being far more
complicated).
But I'm on Windows and there don't seem to be any servers ready compiled
for use. Nor do they look like they'll be straight forward to com
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 7:35 AM Christian Brabandt wrote:
>
>
> On Mo, 18 Feb 2019, Jason Franklin wrote:
>
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Trying to figure out if this is intentional or not. It is definitelya
> > backward search?
> > surprising given how the documentation (":h gn") is written.
> >
> > T
14 matches
Mail list logo
