Re: Latest netrw doesn't work with multi-byte strings

2013-12-04 Fir de Conversatie mattn
On Thursday, December 5, 2013 1:18:17 PM UTC+9, Charles Campbell wrote: > mattn wrote: > > > Hi list. > > > > > > Currently, vim bundle netrw v149. It doesn't work with multi-byte strings. > > > This problem occur in v149, 150j both. > > > > > > Below is a patch for v150j. > > > > > > --- a

[PATCH] Issue 125: does not show up when showcmd is set.

2013-12-04 Fir de Conversatie Brook Hong
I'd also like to use as leader key, as the issue reporter. https://code.google.com/p/vim/issues/detail?id=125 diff --git a/src/normal.c b/src/normal.c index 013fdce..cb092a0 100644 --- a/src/normal.c +++ b/src/normal.c @@ -4021,6 +4021,9 @@ add_to_showcmd(c) #endif p = transchar(c); +

Re: Latest netrw doesn't work with multi-byte strings

2013-12-04 Fir de Conversatie Charles Campbell
mattn wrote: Hi list. Currently, vim bundle netrw v149. It doesn't work with multi-byte strings. This problem occur in v149, 150j both. Below is a patch for v150j. --- autoload/netrw.vim.org 2013-11-29 09:51:50.637597900 +0900 +++ autoload/netrw.vim 2013-11-29 09:53:09.361597900 +0900 @@

Re: Latest netrw doesn't work with multi-byte strings

2013-12-04 Fir de Conversatie Charles Campbell
mattn wrote: Hi list. Currently, vim bundle netrw v149. It doesn't work with multi-byte strings. This problem occur in v149, 150j both. Below is a patch for v150j. --- autoload/netrw.vim.org 2013-11-29 09:51:50.637597900 +0900 +++ autoload/netrw.vim 2013-11-29 09:53:09.361597900 +0900 @@

Latest netrw doesn't work with multi-byte strings

2013-12-04 Fir de Conversatie mattn
Hi list. Currently, vim bundle netrw v149. It doesn't work with multi-byte strings. This problem occur in v149, 150j both. Below is a patch for v150j. --- autoload/netrw.vim.org 2013-11-29 09:51:50.637597900 +0900 +++ autoload/netrw.vim 2013-11-29 09:53:09.361597900 +0900 @@ -8608,7 +8608,

Re: ActivePerl 5.18.1 fails to compile

2013-12-04 Fir de Conversatie Cesar Romani
On 04/12/2013 07:35 p.m., Steve Hall wrote: On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Cesar Romani wrote: On 04/12/2013 08:09 a.m., Bram Moolenaar wrote: Is this specific for this version of Perl? If so, what kind of condition (flag) should we use for this? Cygwin -- Both Strawberry 5.18 and Act

Re: ActivePerl 5.18.1 fails to compile

2013-12-04 Fir de Conversatie Steve Hall
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Cesar Romani wrote: > On 04/12/2013 08:09 a.m., Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > > > Is this specific for this version of Perl? If so, what kind of > > condition (flag) should we use for this? > > Cygwin > -- > Both Strawberry 5.18 and ActivePerl 5.18 only need the fo

Re: ActivePerl 5.18.1 fails to compile

2013-12-04 Fir de Conversatie Cesar Romani
On 04/12/2013 08:09 a.m., Bram Moolenaar wrote: Cesar Romani wrote: On 01/12/2013 09:11 a.m., Steve Hall wrote: FINALLY! Thanks Ken and Cesar for the help. Okay, it took three parts to get my Cygwin cross-compile for Windows build to work with Perl: 1. Patching vim\Make_cyg.mak (via Cesar R

Re: Issue 185 in vim: When executing a recent version of make from within vim, a change in directory is not recognised

2013-12-04 Fir de Conversatie vim
Comment #3 on issue 185 by kno0...@gmail.com: When executing a recent version of make from within vim, a change in directory is not recognised http://code.google.com/p/vim/issues/detail?id=185 That looks like a smarter way of doing it (as in no line duplication) but unfortunately it's not w

[PATCH] Proof of concept: thread-safe message queue

2013-12-04 Fir de Conversatie Thiago Padilha
This patch implements the concept suggested in this post: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/vim_dev/lylNU4Na2Nk Heres a simple explanation of whats going on: - A frozen 'background' thread is started at the beginning of the program. - At every iteration, the main_loop function will wake tha

Re: [patch] Added v:completed_item feature for CompleteDone event

2013-12-04 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Shougo Matsu wrote: > Hi, Bram. > I added v:completed_item feature for CompleteDone event. > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/vim_dev/XDFDQ8rkBII/xfOjjDzpa00J > > This feature is useful for printing selected item information. > You can get the selected dictionary which has "word", "abbr", "men

Re: help unclear about zd and undo

2013-12-04 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Ben Fritz wrote: > :help zd says, "this easily deletes more folds than you expect and > there is no undo." > > But if foldmethod is marker, undo/redo work just fine. > > I think this should be clarified to "this easily deletes more folds > than you expect and there is no undo when foldmethod=ma

Re: help unclear about zd and undo

2013-12-04 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Ben Fritz wrote: > On Sunday, December 1, 2013 12:51:56 PM UTC-6, Ben Fritz wrote: > > :help zd says, "this easily deletes more folds than you expect and there is > > no undo." > > > > But if foldmethod is marker, undo/redo work just fine. > > > > I think this should be clarified to "this easi

Re: ActivePerl 5.18.1 fails to compile

2013-12-04 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Cesar Romani wrote: > On 01/12/2013 09:11 a.m., Steve Hall wrote: > > FINALLY! Thanks Ken and Cesar for the help. > > > > Okay, it took three parts to get my Cygwin cross-compile for Windows > > build to work with Perl: > > > > 1. Patching vim\Make_cyg.mak (via Cesar Romani) > > > > --- C:\vim\Ma

Re: tiny fix for doc

2013-12-04 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Yukihiro Nakadaira wrote: > In autocmd.txt, TextChanged and TextChangedI are not listed in :h > autocommand-events. > In eval.txt, there are some inconsistent notation ([expr] -> [{expr}]). > > Please check the attached patch. Thanks. I actually prefer [expr] over [{expr}]. This works when it

Re: Issue 185 in vim: When executing a recent version of make from within vim, a change in directory is not recognised

2013-12-04 Fir de Conversatie vim
Comment #2 on issue 185 by brammool...@gmail.com: When executing a recent version of make from within vim, a change in directory is not recognised http://code.google.com/p/vim/issues/detail?id=185 Does it work to do it like this: \%D%*\\a[%*\\d]:\ Entering\ directory\ [`']%f', \%X