Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Raf wrote:
>
> > > > Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Announcing: Vim (Vi IMproved) version 7.4a BETA
> > > > >
> > > > > This is the first BETA release of Vim 7.4.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please check that the distribution is OK. I haven't done one for a
> > > >
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 02:58:37PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> Patch 7.4a.006
> Problem:Failure in po file check goes unnoticed.
> Solution: Fail "make test" if the po file check fails.
> Files:src/Makefile
After this patch, "make test" with a shadowdir fails. Attached pat
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> Tim Harder wrote:
>
> > I've attached a patch to fix an issue where the wrong python3 config
> > directory is used when a system's sys.abiflags are empty.
>
> Hmm, but when adding vi_cv_var_python3_abiflags when it's not empty,
> might as
I am trying to compile vim in windows7 and I am getting and error.
There are some conversion warnings during compilation but all files compile.
When linking I get the error that follows below.
I am using visual studio 10 to compile vim.
cl -c /W3 /nologo -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_PATHDEF -DW
Vlad Irnov wrote:
> I get E315 errors in Vim 7.4a, but not in Vim 7.3.829 and earlier.
> In a nutshell, when a buffer in another window is modified via Python
> buffer object, folds in the current buffer get messed up, jumping to
> the last line results in multiple E315.
>
> The script below sho
Ken Takata wrote:
> I found some typos in patch files and hg log after 7.4a.
> I know that the hg log cannot be modified, but I think it's better
> to fix when merge them into version7.txt.
Thanks!
--
The Characters and incidents portrayed and the names used are fictitious and
any similarity
Ken Takata wrote:
> Vim's patch number is normally three-digit and zero-padded. (e.g. 7.4a.009)
> But when I see the result of :intro, it is zero-suppressed.
> (e.g. version 7.4a.9 BETA) Is this intended?
> I think it's better to use same representation.
Well, applying the "shorter is better" r
Tim Harder wrote:
> I've attached a patch to fix an issue where the wrong python3 config
> directory is used when a system's sys.abiflags are empty.
Hmm, but when adding vi_cv_var_python3_abiflags when it's not empty,
might as well do:
config_dir="config-${vi_cv_var_python3_version}${vi_cv_var_
Richo Healey wrote:
> On OSX 10.9 (mavericks preview), the definiton of sigaltstack on line
> 830 of os_unix.c is superfluous and causes the build to fail.
>
> Sorry, my C is rusty and I'm still finding my way around vim's source,
> so I don't have a patch.
>
> I was testing on changeset: 517
On OSX 10.9 (mavericks preview), the definiton of sigaltstack on line 830 of
os_unix.c is superfluous and causes the build to fail.
Sorry, my C is rusty and I'm still finding my way around vim's source, so I
don't have a patch.
I was testing on changeset: 5171:5bb04d03dfa8
--
--
You receiv
On Jul 10, 2013 5:51 PM, "Tony Mechelynck"
wrote:
>
> On 10/07/13 14:08, Milan Vancura wrote:
>>>
>>> How about "A more pythonic Python interface"?
>>
>>
>> I would prefer clearer summary: what exactly is now possible?
>>
>> Example questions:
>>
>> * Can I write a script for vim in python only, w
On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 4:19:40 PM UTC+8, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
> Your user scripts should not have been in vim73 to begin with. That
>
> directory tree (and now vim74a) is ONLY for scripts distributed together
>
> with Vim, and which you must NEVER change, because any update may, and a
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 148 by c...@lehnerstudios.com: IPv6 support for Vim NetBeans
http://code.google.com/p/vim/issues/detail?id=148
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. :nbstart:ipv6.example.org
What is the expected output? What do you see i
On 10/07/13 14:08, Milan Vancura wrote:
How about "A more pythonic Python interface"?
I would prefer clearer summary: what exactly is now possible?
Example questions:
* Can I write a script for vim in python only, without vimscript?
Yes, but it will only run in a Vim compiled with +python,
On 10/07/13 14:11, Ken Takata wrote:
Hi,
I found some typos in patch files and hg log after 7.4a.
I know that the hg log cannot be modified, but I think it's better
to fix when merge them into version7.txt.
Regards,
Ken Takata
…and for anyone trying to find that 7.4a README file, it is at
h
Hi,
I found some typos in patch files and hg log after 7.4a.
I know that the hg log cannot be modified, but I think it's better
to fix when merge them into version7.txt.
Regards,
Ken Takata
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the
ZyX,
it's probably beter to ask you directly... Can you send a short description,
please?
Milan
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
Yo
> How about "A more pythonic Python interface"?
I would prefer clearer summary: what exactly is now possible?
Example questions:
* Can I write a script for vim in python only, without vimscript?
* What's the advantage? Is there new data model easier to understand than
a myriad of random vimsc
Hi,
Vim's patch number is normally three-digit and zero-padded. (e.g. 7.4a.009)
But when I see the result of :intro, it is zero-suppressed.
(e.g. version 7.4a.9 BETA) Is this intended?
I think it's better to use same representation.
--- a/src/version.c
+++ b/src/version.c
@@ -1392,11 +1392,11 @@
On 10 July 2013 12:25, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> Milan Vancura wrote:
>
>> > The biggest additions since 7.3:
>> > - A new, faster regular expression engine.
>> > - More than a thousand fixes and small improvements.
>>
>> ...and all the work about python? What's the current status, why it is not
>
Milan Vancura wrote:
> > The biggest additions since 7.3:
> > - A new, faster regular expression engine.
> > - More than a thousand fixes and small improvements.
>
> ...and all the work about python? What's the current status, why it is not
> listed? It was a set of dozens and dozens patches and
Raf wrote:
> > > Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> > >
> > > > Announcing: Vim (Vi IMproved) version 7.4a BETA
> > > >
> > > > This is the first BETA release of Vim 7.4.
> > > >
> > > > Please check that the distribution is OK. I haven't done one for a long
> > > > time. Report anything that isn't ri
Hello.
> The biggest additions since 7.3:
> - A new, faster regular expression engine.
> - More than a thousand fixes and small improvements.
...and all the work about python? What's the current status, why it is not
listed? It was a set of dozens and dozens patches and I'm lost now what's the
re
On 10/07/13 04:45, Hienning Lueng wrote:
It's wired. Did we make any big change between these revisions?
My system: Windows 7 with sp1. Before my upgrade, my Vim installed to
D:\Apps\Vim with following directory structure:
D:\Apps\Vim
vim73\ vim 7.3.1311
vimfiles\my plugins
24 matches
Mail list logo
