Re: Windows doesn't support -f option

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Ben Fritz
On Monday, May 20, 2013 4:37:44 AM UTC-5, Tony Mechelynck wrote: > On 20/05/13 05:53, Ben Fritz wrote: > > > Does it matter what is used to compile Vim? I think (but do not know) that > > > the "Cream" distribution is compiled in MinGW, which I use at home to > > > compile Vim when I'm on Window

Re: Problems of new regexp engine (that we know)

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Yasuhiro MATSUMOTO
OK, I'll do it. However I doubt that there are some cases that new regexp engine is slower than original. This change make be possible to work with html file syntax, but re=2 seems to be slower than re=1. On 5/24/13, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > Yasuhiro Matsumoto wrote: > >> Currently, I'm trying

Re: [PATCH] Fix compilation failure with Ruby 2.0.0

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Andrei Olsen
> > 2. 64-bit WinPE does not have a WOW64 subsystem, hence you cannot run > > a 32-bit executable. > > What is WinPE? Windows Preinstallation Environment http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Preinstallation_Environment http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh825110.aspx Basically, a live

Re: Patch 7.3.1008

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Ken Takata
Hi Bram, 2013/05/24 Fri 5:43:25 UTC+9 Bram Moolenaar wrote: > Patch 7.3.1008 > Problem:Test 95 fails on MS-Windows. > Solution: Set 'nomore'. Change \i to \f. Change multi-byte character to > something that is not matching \i. (Ken Takata) > Files:src/testdir/test95.in

Re: [patch] test95 fails on Windows

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Ken Takata wrote: > 2013/05/24 Fri 2:47:19 UTC+9 Bram Moolenaar: > > Ken Takata wrote: > > > > > I found some problems in the test95. > > > > > > 1. The test waits a user's input because "set nomore" is missing. > > > 2. The test fails on Windows because \i matches =A7 (0xa7). > > >The defa

Re: [PATCH] Fix compilation failure with Ruby 2.0.0

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Ben Fritz wrote: > On Tuesday, May 21, 2013 3:01:05 PM UTC-5, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > Skeept wrote: > > > Also for the next release, if possible would it be possible to > > > distribute a 64 bit for windows as well a 32 bit? > > > > It's not all that useful. It uses more memory, is probably

Re: To all syntax file maintainers: examples needed

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Thomas Köhler wrote: > Hello Bram, > > Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > The plan is to include a new regexp engine in Vim 7.4. For testing > > I would like to get a lot of files for which we have syntax > > highlighting. I can then compare the highlighting of these files with > > the old and the new

Patch 7.3.1008

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Patch 7.3.1008 Problem:Test 95 fails on MS-Windows. Solution: Set 'nomore'. Change \i to \f. Change multi-byte character to something that is not matching \i. (Ken Takata) Files: src/testdir/test95.in, src/testdir/test95.ok *** ../vim-7.3.1007/src/testdir/test95.in

Patch 7.3.1007

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Patch 7.3.1007 Problem:Can't build on Minix 3.2.1. Solution: Add a condition to an #ifdef. (Gautam Tirumala) Files: src/memfile.c *** ../vim-7.3.1006/src/memfile.c 2013-05-06 04:21:35.0 +0200 --- src/memfile.c 2013-05-23 22:22:22.0 +0200 *** ***

Re: minor doc patches

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Thilo Six wrote: > doc/options.txt > *'regexpengine''* *'re'* > ^ > > > also: > > doc/options.txt > - *'undofile'* *'udf'* > + *'undofile'* *'noundofile'* *'udf'* *'noudf'* > > Thanks! -- ARTHUR: You are indee

Re: [PATCH] build fix for Minix 3.2.1

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Thomas Cort wrote: > Greetings, > > Attached is a one line fix to get vim to build out of the box on Minix 3.2.1. > Patch originally by Gautam Tirumala Thanks, I'll include it. -- ARTHUR: What are you going to do. bleed on me? "Monty Python and the Holy Grail" PYTHON (MONTY)

Patch 7.3.1006

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Patch 7.3.1006 Problem:NFA engine not used for "\_[0-9]". Solution: Enable this, fixed in patch 1005. Files: src/regexp_nfa.c *** ../vim-7.3.1005/src/regexp_nfa.c2013-05-22 23:00:34.0 +0200 --- src/regexp_nfa.c2013-05-23 22:19:29.0 +0200 *** *** 679

minor doc patches

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Thilo Six
Hello Bram doc/options.txt *'regexpengine''* *'re'* ^ also: doc/options.txt - *'undofile'* *'udf'* + *'undofile'* *'noundofile'* *'udf'* *'noudf'* -- Regards, Thilo 4096R/0xC70B1A8F 721B 1BA0 095C 1ABA 3FC6 7C18

Re: Plans for Vim 7.4

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Thomas Köhler wrote: > Hello Bram, hello Ron, > > Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > Hello Vim users, > [...] > > Besides that, if you are maintaining runtime files, please send me any > > pending updates. I will not make big changes just before the release, > > everything needs some time for testing.

Re: Plans for Vim 7.4

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Thomas Köhler wrote: > Hallo Bram, > > Thomas Köhler wrote: > > Attached, you can find a new version of prolog.vim (syntax > > highlightning for prolog) and koehler.vim (my colorscheme). The > > former fixes a bug in prologClauseHead higlightning, the later > > now supports the Underline and Ign

Re: Problems of new regexp engine (that we know)

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Ben Fritz wrote: > On Thursday, May 23, 2013 12:47:20 PM UTC-5, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > > > > > Friday is the deadline for new features and larger changes. After that > > > > it's bug fixing only! > > > > Friday in 8 days, I assume, not Friday tomorrow? Yes, end of May. -- Hanson's Tre

Re: To all syntax file maintainers: examples needed

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Rob Hoelz
On Saturday, May 11, 2013 6:00:11 PM UTC+2, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > The plan is to include a new regexp engine in Vim 7.4. For testing > > I would like to get a lot of files for which we have syntax > > highlighting. I can then compare the highlighting of these files with > > the old and the n

Re: Building Vim in windows with python perl support

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie ashwin sathya
Thanks for the help David and Christian. I used the wikia page and made some little changes. Have uploaded the built executables in github. https://github.com/ashwinsa/Vimrc For general public's usage. Thanks again. On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Christian Brabandt wrote: > > On Mi, 22 Ma

Re: Problems of new regexp engine (that we know)

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Ben Fritz
On Thursday, May 23, 2013 12:47:20 PM UTC-5, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > > Friday is the deadline for new features and larger changes. After that > > it's bug fixing only! > Friday in 8 days, I assume, not Friday tomorrow? -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not t

Re: Plans for Vim 7.4

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Thomas Köhler
Hallo Bram, Thomas Köhler wrote: > While I'm at it, I also just fixed a bug in uil.vim, see attached > version. Well, next time I'll first fix ALL bugs, then submit a new version... here's the final version that fixes another small glitch. Ciao, Thomas -- Thomas Köhler Email: jean-

Re: Problems of new regexp engine (that we know)

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Marc Weber
As I've said: having vim read plugin/*.vim files and adding some runtimepath/python-lib dir if it exists to sys.dir would be genious. Then people could use plugin/plugin.py only and have it lazily load its code using "import" Marc Weber -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" mailli

Re: Patch 7.3.1005

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Cesar Romani
On 23/05/2013 11:32 a.m., Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > Cesar Romani wrote: > >> On 22/05/2013 08:17 p.m., h_east wrote: >> > Hi, Cesar >> > >> > 2013/5/23(Thu) 8:04:11 UTC+9 Cesar: >> >> It doesn't solve the issue for "%s/^\n\+/\r". It gets stuck as before. >> > >> > Really? >> >

Re: Pretty ugly bug in the new regex engine

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Christian Brabandt
Hi Bram! On Do, 23 Mai 2013, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > Ron Aaron wrote: > > > Executing this regex: > > > > s#יְהוָה\Z#\\hashem{}#eg > > > > On this text: > > > > וְיַעֲשׂוּ בְנֵי-יִשְׂרָאֵל אֶת-הַפָּסַח, בְּמוֹעֲדוֹ > > > > Gives this garbage: > > > > \hashem{}\hashem{}\hashem

Re: Pretty ugly bug in the new regex engine

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Ron Aaron wrote: > Executing this regex: > > s#יְהוָה\Z#\\hashem{}#eg > > On this text: > > וְיַעֲשׂוּ בְנֵי-יִשְׂרָאֵל אֶת-הַפָּסַח, בְּמוֹעֲדוֹ > > Gives this garbage: > > \hashem{}\hashem{}\hashem{}\hashem{}\hashem{}\hashem{}\hashem{}\hashem{} > > Instead of this : > >

Re: Problems of new regexp engine (that we know)

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Yasuhiro Matsumoto wrote: > Currently, I'm trying to fix \%# \%23c #%<23c . > > https://gist.github.com/mattn/5626661 > > I'll send a patch in later. I very much appreciate the help. Please also write tests. Lots of bugs slipped through because we don't have sufficient testing. -- DENNIS:

Re: [patch] test95 fails on Windows

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Ken Takata wrote: > I found some problems in the test95. > > 1. The test waits a user's input because "set nomore" is missing. > 2. The test fails on Windows because \i matches =A7 (0xa7). >The default value of 'isident' is different on Windows. > 3. There are three tests using \i in the tes

Re: Problems of new regexp engine (that we know)

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Marc Weber wrote: > I'd be interested in a high level overview about what can/should be done > for the release to happen. > > This way people who are willing to help (eventually me) can pick a task, > document that they are working on it, and get it done. > > Does it exist? If a titanpad or pub

Re: Patch 7.3.1005

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Cesar Romani wrote: > On 22/05/2013 08:17 p.m., h_east wrote: > > Hi, Cesar > > > > 2013/5/23(Thu) 8:04:11 UTC+9 Cesar: > >> It doesn't solve the issue for "%s/^\n\+/\r". It gets stuck as before. > > > > Really? > > My vim7.3.1005 works well. It appears to have solved for me. > > > > Bes

Re: To all syntax file maintainers: examples needed

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Thomas Köhler
Hello Bram, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > The plan is to include a new regexp engine in Vim 7.4. For testing > I would like to get a lot of files for which we have syntax > highlighting. I can then compare the highlighting of these files with > the old and the new engine to find anything that is not c

Re: Patch 7.3.1005

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Cesar Romani
On 22/05/2013 08:17 p.m., h_east wrote: > Hi, Cesar > > 2013/5/23(Thu) 8:04:11 UTC+9 Cesar: >> It doesn't solve the issue for "%s/^\n\+/\r". It gets stuck as before. > > Really? > My vim7.3.1005 works well. It appears to have solved for me. > > Best regards, > Hirohito Higashi > It doesn't work.

[patch] test95 fails on Windows

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Ken Takata
Hi, I found some problems in the test95. 1. The test waits a user's input because "set nomore" is missing. 2. The test fails on Windows because \i matches § (0xa7). The default value of 'isident' is different on Windows. 3. There are three tests using \i in the test95, but the last one shou

Pretty ugly bug in the new regex engine

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Ron Aaron
Executing this regex: s#יְהוָה\Z#\\hashem{}#eg On this text: וְיַעֲשׂוּ בְנֵי-יִשְׂרָאֵל אֶת-הַפָּסַח, בְּמוֹעֲדוֹ Gives this garbage: \hashem{}\hashem{}\hashem{}\hashem{}\hashem{}\hashem{}\hashem{}\hashem{} Instead of this : וְיַעֲשׂוּ בְנֵי־יִשְׂרָאֵל אֶת־הַפָּסַח, בְּמוֹעֲדו

Re: Plans for Vim 7.4

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Thomas Köhler
Hello Bram, hello Ron, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > Hello Vim users, [...] > Besides that, if you are maintaining runtime files, please send me any > pending updates. I will not make big changes just before the release, > everything needs some time for testing. Let's set a deadline at the end > of Ma

Re: Plans for Vim 7.4

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Thomas Köhler
Hallo Bram, Thomas Köhler wrote: > Attached, you can find a new version of prolog.vim (syntax > highlightning for prolog) and koehler.vim (my colorscheme). The > former fixes a bug in prologClauseHead higlightning, the later > now supports the Underline and Ignore groups. While I'm at it, I also

Re: [PATCH] Fix small typo in regexp.c

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Rob Hoelz wrote: > I was diving in the Vim source, and I found a small typo. Here's a > patch to fix it. Thanks. -- DENNIS: Oh, very nice. King, eh! I expect you've got a palace and fine clothes and courtiers and plenty of food. And how d'you get that? By exploiting the wor

Re: Problems of new regexp engine (that we know)

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie mattn
Bram, I fixed: * \%# * \%23c \%23l * \%<23c \%<23l * \%>23c \%>23l * Treat leading "*" as star character * \_[ * \@! https://gist.github.com/mattn/5626661 Please check this patch. - Yasuhiro Matsumoto -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your rep

[PATCH] Fix small typo in regexp.c

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Rob Hoelz
I was diving in the Vim source, and I found a small typo. Here's a patch to fix it. Thanks, Rob -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- Y

Re: Patch 7.3.1005

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie William Fugh
it's still slow for general search, especially in big file. -. Vim 7.3 1005/Vista -. file size, c. 20M (utf-8) It's got stuck after 7.3-996 for me. -Regards, William On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:17 AM, h_east wrote: > Hi, Cesar > > 2013/5/23(Thu) 8:04:11 UTC+9 Cesar: > > It doesn't solve the is