Re: Colaboratiion feature hint [Re: Plans for Vim 7.4]

2013-05-22 Fir de Conversatie Charles
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Oliver Rath wrote: > Hi list! > > Am 09.05.2013 05:51, schrieb Bram Moolenaar: >> >> [..] >> 5. add collaborative editing >> [..] > > This is a feature that Im looking for a long time. Im not so deep inside > that I would be able to write the code for this, but may

Colaboratiion feature hint [Re: Plans for Vim 7.4]

2013-05-22 Fir de Conversatie Oliver Rath
Hi list! Am 09.05.2013 05:51, schrieb Bram Moolenaar: > > [..] > 5. add collaborative editing > [..] This is a feature that Im looking for a long time. Im not so deep inside that I would be able to write the code for this, but maybe I can give a hint from the Libreoffice-project, which uses this

Issue 135 in vim: Segfault when using omnicppcomplete/clang_complete

2013-05-22 Fir de Conversatie vim
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 135 by adam900...@gmail.com: Segfault when using omnicppcomplete/clang_complete http://code.google.com/p/vim/issues/detail?id=135 What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Use omnicppcomplete/clang_complete on a struct and

Re: [patch] get quickfix stack

2013-05-22 Fir de Conversatie LCD 47
On 22 May 2013, Christian Brabandt wrote: > Hi LCD! > > On Mi, 22 Mai 2013, LCD 47 wrote: > > On 22 May 2013, LCD 47 wrote: > > [...] > > > Excellent, thank you! I'll play with it for a while, then > > > post my conclusions. > > > > There seems to be a bug in getlocstack(), it misses

Re: Plans for Vim 7.4

2013-05-22 Fir de Conversatie ZyX
> BTW: Is there any upcoming support for c++11 especially indent of c++11 > files? Syntax highlighting can be done by external systax files but the > indenting could not be modified by users. Really? Check out :h 'indentexpr'. It could be modified, but you will either have to do some hacks rely

Re: Patch 7.3.1005

2013-05-22 Fir de Conversatie h_east
Hi, Cesar 2013/5/23(Thu) 8:04:11 UTC+9 Cesar: > It doesn't solve the issue for "%s/^\n\+/\r". It gets stuck as before. Really? My vim7.3.1005 works well. It appears to have solved for me. Best regards, Hirohito Higashi -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-p

Re: [PATCH] Fix compilation failure with Ruby 2.0.0

2013-05-22 Fir de Conversatie Andrei Olsen
> For me compiling ruby with visual studio was the way to go since I have tried > to build with mingw and python and for some reason it did not link correctly > (the 32 bit version works fine). Oh, I forgot that I had a slightly modified make file. It will work if you add -DMS_WIN64 to DEFINES

Re: Patch 7.3.1005

2013-05-22 Fir de Conversatie Cesar Romani
On 22/05/2013 04:02 p.m., Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > Patch 7.3.1005 > Problem:Get stuck on regexp "\n*" and on "%s/^\n\+/\r". > Solution: Fix handling of matching a line break. (idea by Hirohito > Higashi) > Files: src/regexp_nfa.c > > > *** ../vim-7.3.1004/src/regexp_nfa.c 2013

Re: [PATCH] Fix compilation failure with Ruby 2.0.0

2013-05-22 Fir de Conversatie xxx
On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 5:05:23 AM UTC-5, Andrei Olsen wrote: > kl. 23:40:01 UTC+2 tirsdag 21. mai 2013 skrev skeept følgende: > > > Well, I have downloaded the 64 bit 2.0-p195 rubyinstaller from > > http://rubyinstaller.org/downloads/ > > > and configured ruby with > > > RUBY="C:\htemp\Rub

[PATCH] build fix for Minix 3.2.1

2013-05-22 Fir de Conversatie Thomas Cort
Greetings, Attached is a one line fix to get vim to build out of the box on Minix 3.2.1. Patch originally by Gautam Tirumala Thomas -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit htt

Re: NFA regression on split()

2013-05-22 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
David Fishburn wrote: > Using 7.3.1004 on Win 7 64 bit. > > gvim -u NONE -U NONE --noplugins > > :set re=0 > :echo split(" TBD NOTE XXX FIXME TODO \n") > ['TBD', 'NOTE', 'XXX', 'FIXME', 'TODO', ' > '] > > :set re=1 > :echo split(" TBD NOTE XXX FIXME TODO \n") > ['TBD', 'NOTE', 'XXX', 'FIXME',

Re: Can the regexpengine and python bonanza be moved to a beta branch?

2013-05-22 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Manuel Ortega wrote: > Now that there is no longer pressure to quickly cram everything in to avoid > patchlevel 1000 and up (too late), shouldn't the regex engine stuff and the > flurry of pythoniana be moved into a 7.4beta branch, or vim-experimental > branch or something like that? > > There i

Re: Building Vim in windows with python perl support

2013-05-22 Fir de Conversatie Christian Brabandt
On Mi, 22 Mai 2013, ashwin sathya wrote: > Is there any wiki doc where i can find instructions on building vim with > latest patches (not using Cygwin, using the make_mvc.mak, Visual Studio) > with support for Python (2, 3) and Perl ? http://vim.wikia.com/wiki/Build_Vim_in_Windows_with_Visual_St

Patch 7.3.1005

2013-05-22 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Patch 7.3.1005 Problem:Get stuck on regexp "\n*" and on "%s/^\n\+/\r". Solution: Fix handling of matching a line break. (idea by Hirohito Higashi) Files: src/regexp_nfa.c *** ../vim-7.3.1004/src/regexp_nfa.c2013-05-21 22:00:42.0 +0200 --- src/regexp_nfa.c2013-05-22 22:

Can the regexpengine and python bonanza be moved to a beta branch?

2013-05-22 Fir de Conversatie Manuel Ortega
Dear Bram, Now that there is no longer pressure to quickly cram everything in to avoid patchlevel 1000 and up (too late), shouldn't the regex engine stuff and the flurry of pythoniana be moved into a 7.4beta branch, or vim-experimental branch or something like that? There is just so much build fa

Re: [patch] get quickfix stack

2013-05-22 Fir de Conversatie Christian Brabandt
Hi LCD! On Mi, 22 Mai 2013, LCD 47 wrote: > On 22 May 2013, LCD 47 wrote: > [...] > > Excellent, thank you! I'll play with it for a while, then post my > > conclusions. > > There seems to be a bug in getlocstack(), it misses the first entry. > Example: after a single run of syntastic ch

Re: Building Vim in windows with python perl support

2013-05-22 Fir de Conversatie David Fishburn
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:24 AM, ashwin sathya wrote: > Hi, > > Is there any wiki doc where i can find instructions on building vim with > latest patches (not using Cygwin, using the make_mvc.mak, Visual Studio) > with support for Python (2, 3) and Perl ? > ... > I wrote a batch file to do my co

Re: Problems of new regexp engine (that we know)

2013-05-22 Fir de Conversatie Yasuhiro MATSUMOTO
Currently, I'm trying to fix \%# \%23c #%<23c . https://gist.github.com/mattn/5626661 I'll send a patch in later. On 5/22/13, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > Hirohito Higashi wrote: > >> Hi, Bram >> >> I found NFA regexp engine bug. >> >> Prerequisite >> vim 7.3.1004 >> set re=0 >> >> How to reprodu

Re: Issue 134 in vim: Pasting over visually selected line of new buffer not correctly undoable

2013-05-22 Fir de Conversatie Christian Brabandt
On Mi, 22 Mai 2013, v...@googlecode.com wrote: > Status: New > Owner: > Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium > > New issue 134 by hkpt...@gmail.com: Pasting over visually selected > line of new buffer not correctly undoable > http://code.google.com/p/vim/issues/detail?id=134 > > Steps to re

Building Vim in windows with python perl support

2013-05-22 Fir de Conversatie ashwin sathya
Hi, Is there any wiki doc where i can find instructions on building vim with latest patches (not using Cygwin, using the make_mvc.mak, Visual Studio) with support for Python (2, 3) and Perl ? -- Thanks & Regards, R Ashwin Sathya -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do

Re: Calling Sureshkumar Manimuthu ...

2013-05-22 Fir de Conversatie Antonio Giovanni Colombo
Hi, he is present both on LinkedIn (India, works for Texas Instruments) and Facebook, you could try that way. Of course I cannot guarantee he is the right person, but it seems rather likely... All the best, Antonio On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Ron Aaron wrote: > I'm trying to contact Sures

Re: [RFC] Enhance syntax support

2013-05-22 Fir de Conversatie me
> You say "decouple" which means "make them less dependent on each other". But > your examples seem to be asking for making various commands more > context-aware, which would probably be *more* coupled to syntax, not less. > Which do you want? What I mean by this is that there are things like '

Re: Problems of new regexp engine (that we know)

2013-05-22 Fir de Conversatie Marc Weber
Hi Bram, I'd be interested in a high level overview about what can/should be done for the release to happen. This way people who are willing to help (eventually me) can pick a task, document that they are working on it, and get it done. Does it exist? If a titanpad or public google documents wou

Re: Problems of new regexp engine (that we know)

2013-05-22 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Hirohito Higashi wrote: > Hi, Bram > > I found NFA regexp engine bug. > > Prerequisite > vim 7.3.1004 > set re=0 > > How to reproduce > vim -N -u NONE -i NONE --noplugin > o > /\n*or /\_.* > > Actual > gone infinite loop. > > How to take back control. (on linux) > pgrep -lf > kill -9

vim 7.3.1004 hangs indefinitely with some commands

2013-05-22 Fir de Conversatie Cesar Romani
By using vim 7.3.1004 on Windows 7, the following command doesn't work anymore: %s/^\n\+/\r it hangs indefinitely, say, with the following text (without dashes): Tread lightly, she is near Under the snow, Speak gently, she can hear The daisies grow. -

Re: slow scrolling

2013-05-22 Fir de Conversatie John Little
On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 5:58:26 PM UTC+12, LCD 47 wrote: > I don't have numbers to back that up With the new engine, and syntax colouring on, but regexp logging turned off, eval.txt (from the vim help) takes about 25 s for me to scroll from top to bottom, holding down ctrl-F. (This in gvim o

Re: Problems of new regexp engine (that we know)

2013-05-22 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Christian Brabandt wrote: > On Di, 21 Mai 2013, Christian Brabandt wrote: > > > And also not supported yet are \_[...] > > collections. > > BTW: This patch enables the \_[...] collections. > > diff --git a/src/regexp_nfa.c b/src/regexp_nfa.c > --- a/src/regexp_nfa.c > +++ b/src/regexp_nfa.c

Re: Patch 7.3.1004

2013-05-22 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Mats Bertil Tegner wrote: > On 05/21/2013 10:38 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > > > Patch 7.3.1004 > > Problem:No error when option could not be set. > > Solution: Report an error. (ZyX) > > Files: src/if_py_both.h, src/option.c, src/proto/option.pro, > > src/testdir/test86.o

Re: [PATCH] Fix compilation failure with Ruby 2.0.0

2013-05-22 Fir de Conversatie Andrei Olsen
kl. 23:40:01 UTC+2 tirsdag 21. mai 2013 skrev skeept følgende: > Well, I have downloaded the 64 bit 2.0-p195 rubyinstaller from > http://rubyinstaller.org/downloads/ > and configured ruby with > RUBY="C:\htemp\Ruby200-x64" DYNAMIC_RUBY=yes RUBY_VER=20 RUBY_VER_LONG=2.0.0 ^ > > when compiling I g

Re: Patch 7.3.1004

2013-05-22 Fir de Conversatie Mats Bertil Tegner
On 05/21/2013 10:38 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote: Patch 7.3.1004 Problem:No error when option could not be set. Solution: Report an error. (ZyX) Files: src/if_py_both.h, src/option.c, src/proto/option.pro, src/testdir/test86.ok, src/testdir/test87.ok *** ../vim-7.3.1003/src/

Re: Problems of new regexp engine (that we know)

2013-05-22 Fir de Conversatie h_east
Hi, Bram I found NFA regexp engine bug. Prerequisite vim 7.3.1004 set re=0 How to reproduce vim -N -u NONE -i NONE --noplugin o /\n*or /\_.* Actual gone infinite loop. How to take back control. (on linux) pgrep -lf kill -9 nnn <-- nnn is vim process number checked by pgrep.