Tony Mechelynck wrote:
> > What's the simplest way to move the cursor to the start of
> > the word under it?
> > "Under it" includes the word after the cursor if there's no
> > identifier under it.
> ...
> viw`<
Won't work if cursor is in the space before the word.
Weird actually how all
On 24/08/08 06:56, Robert Webb wrote:
> Here's what seems like a really stupid question:
>
> What's the simplest way to move the cursor to the start of the word under
> it?
> "Under it" includes the word after the cursor if there's no identifier under
> it.
>
> None of these quite work:
>
> b - Th
Bjorn Winckler wrote:
> 2008/8/22 Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > On 2008-08-22, bjrn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> This may not be the right place for this post, but it seems like I've
> >> come across a bug so I am posting here.
> >>
> >> If I type
> >>
> >> :args file1.m file
Here's what seems like a really stupid question:
What's the simplest way to move the cursor to the start of the word under
it?
"Under it" includes the word after the cursor if there's no identifier under
it.
None of these quite work:
b - The obvious choice, but won't work if the cursor is alrea
2008/8/23 Jelle Geerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello,
>
> When allocating memory, lalloc() is called, which uses mch_avail_mem(). But
> mch_avail_mem() sometimes fails. It returns the available physical memory +
> available page file memory, which can sometimes wrap around 32-bits.
>
> Also, mch_av
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 12:24 AM, LC Mi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> New to submitting a patch. Please let me know how to submit if folks agree
> with this patch. :-) Thanks!
As the last one touching the Carbon vim GUI code, I'd say this patch
looks fine for me.
However you may want to chec
Hi,
After applying this patch to Vim 7.2, I got following errors while
trying to use K command (and shell also freezes after getting the
errors). I tried to reproduce them with a stable scenario, but
couldn't find a reasonable one. And also, K command sometimes works as
expected, too.
I don't kn
On 24/08/08 01:58, .幻想之诚 wrote:
> Is that a bug, Tony?
I think so; but I suppose Bram would know better than I what causes it.
A little trial and error seems to indicate that if the lower and upper
bounds differ by 256 or less (i.e. if there are at most 257 values in
range) the search proceeds
New to submitting a patch. Please let me know how to submit if folks agree
with this patch. :-) Thanks!
Attach the diff:
Index: src/gui_mac.c
===
--- src/gui_mac.c (revision 1164)
+++ src/gui_mac.c (working copy)
@@ -173,6 +173,7 @@
On 23/08/08 18:09, Markus Heidelberg wrote:
> sc, 23.08.2008:
>>> In view of that, I wonder if the enthusiastic users of this plugin have ever
>>> tested my patch, which is a lot more usable at this time.
>> a lot more useable than what?
>
> than the plugin
>
>> you are asking me to patch no
>> fe
Markus Heidelberg wrote:
> Charles E. Campbell, Jr., 19.08.2008:
>
>> Tony Mechelynck wrote:
>>
>>> On 18/08/08 22:15, Charles Campbell wrote:
>>>
>>>
I've issued a new plugin on my website:
http://mysite.verizon.net/astronaut/vim/index.html#RLTVNMBR . It uses
the
sc, 23.08.2008:
>
> > In view of that, I wonder if the enthusiastic users of this plugin have ever
> > tested my patch, which is a lot more usable at this time.
>
> a lot more useable than what?
than the plugin
> you are asking me to patch no
> fewer than 22 modules:
> [...]
>
> rebuild and r
Moin,
I wounder why noone noticed before: ft_sql.txt is not mentioned in
help.txt. Already reported to Bram.
BTW: I noticed this, while I updated vimhelp-de to the 72 release.
As usual available from http://www.florianrehnisch.de/vimhelp/.
Now in ZIP format as well.
Thanks,
flori
--~--~
On Saturday 23 August 2008 07:24, Markus Heidelberg wrote:
>
> Charles E. Campbell, Jr., 19.08.2008:
> >
> > Tony Mechelynck wrote:
> > > On 18/08/08 22:15, Charles Campbell wrote:
> > >
> > >> I've issued a new plugin on my website:
> > >> http://mysite.verizon.net/astronaut/vim/index.html#R
Charles E. Campbell, Jr., 19.08.2008:
>
> Tony Mechelynck wrote:
> > On 18/08/08 22:15, Charles Campbell wrote:
> >
> >> I've issued a new plugin on my website:
> >> http://mysite.verizon.net/astronaut/vim/index.html#RLTVNMBR . It uses
> >> the signs capability of "huge" vim to give relative
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> John Becket wrote:
>
>> Tony Mechelynck wrote:
>> > Maybe you should set a config-time option (or create one) to
>> > avoid any interaction with the shell?
>> >
>> > Even better: If you don't want ever to become the v
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 3:32 AM, Matt Wozniski wrote:
> Not sure what's going on here, but I've found a crash that's easy to
> reproduce. First, open two X11 enabled vim (not gvim) processes. In
> the first, do:
> :let @+ = repeat('a', 1024*1024)
> in order to store 1MB of data to the clipboard
John Becket wrote:
> Tony Mechelynck wrote:
> > Maybe you should set a config-time option (or create one) to
> > avoid any interaction with the shell?
> >
> > Even better: If you don't want ever to become the victim of
> > any exploit, turn your computer off at the wall switch and
> > leave it o
18 matches
Mail list logo
