> From: kolaloka [mailto:kolal...@freemail.hu]
> Subject: RE: tomcat6 executables on Windows Serer
>
> Well, under Linux, the top lists the "java" process, not an .so
That's because top, ps, and the Windows equivalents show only the initial
executable, not the sha
isted
separately in Task manager) which would reflect the JVM's actual resource
consumption?
>> For me, -ms1024m for my JVM is far too low (physical mem is 1G)
>When I was in school, 1024m == 1G; perhaps things are different now...
I really know about that equation...
best regards: Ba
> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> Subject: Re: [OT] tomcat6 executables on Windows Serer
>
> Now come on, Chuck, be honest !
> When you were in school, they were not even talking about bytes.
Yeah, you're right; we were still using slide rules.
> And t
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
When I was in school, 1024m == 1G; perhaps things are different now...
Now come on, Chuck, be honest !
When you were in school, they were not even talking about bytes.
And the only place they were talking about MegaBytes then was in
science-fiction novels.
--
> From: kolaloka [mailto:kolal...@freemail.hu]
> Subject: tomcat6 executables on Windows Serer
>
> I need to fine-tune GeoServer under Jetty.
Perhaps you should ask on a Jetty list?
> Is tomcat6.exe only a Windows service program that executes
> a JVM such as java.exe
Neith
eal memory demand of this service.
Thank you in advance.
Best regards: Balázs
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/tomcat6-executables-on-Windows-Serer-tp23641419p23641419.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at
