Re: (FIXED) RE: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more than 48K in size

2006-10-31 Thread mast
From: "Caldarale, Charles R" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: (FIXED) RE: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more Where exactly did you put the above? It should go in the section for the DefaultServlet of conf/web.xml (approximately between lines 71 and 82 in an unmodified one). i see i had put

RE: (FIXED) RE: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more than 48K in size

2006-10-31 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: mast [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: (FIXED) RE: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more > than 48K in size > > i have put this in the web.xml of the server > > sendfileSize > -1 > Where exactly did you put the abov

Re: (FIXED) RE: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more than 48K in size

2006-10-31 Thread mast
What happens if you set it to -1? that's what i have try but i still get the same error i have put this in the web.xml of the server sendfileSize -1 the problem is the same with all type of file > 48K (i have try with a jpeg) --

RE: (FIXED) RE: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more than 48K in size

2006-10-31 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: mast [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: (FIXED) RE: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more > than 48K in size > > I have exactly the same problem with a 5.5.17 server and > changing the sendfileSize doesn t seem to fix anything What happens if you set it t

Re: (FIXED) RE: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more than 48K in size

2006-10-31 Thread mast
ct: RE: (FIXED) RE: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more than 48K in size From: Alistair McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: (FIXED) RE: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more than 48K in size Thanks for that. Solved the problem nicely. By the way, I just tested with a 78k static HTM

Re: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more than 48K in size

2006-10-31 Thread Christopher Schultz
Canadafest, > Hello! > > I am trying to enable some video clips files to be downloaded by > users, but unfortunately instead of downloading it opens up the > garbage text on the webpage, just like if u try to open a media file > in notepad or wordpad. #1: Don't hijack threads. Please post a new m

RE: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more than 48K in size

2006-10-31 Thread CANADAFAST INC.
"Caldarale, Charles R" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Alistair McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: (FIXED) RE: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more than > 48K in size > > Thanks for that. Solved the problem nicely. By the way, I just tested wit

(FIXED) RE: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more than 48K in size

2006-10-31 Thread Alistair McDonald
Chuck, Thanks for that. Solved the problem nicely. Cheers, Alistair >> From: Alistair McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more than 48K in size >> >> Tomcat happily serves up pages up to 48K in size, but above >> t

tomcat can't serve HTML pages more than 48K in size

2006-10-31 Thread Alistair McDonald
Hi all. I have a tomcat 5.5.9 installation set up. I only use it to serve HTML pages - no JSP. The HTML is doxygen generated, and validates as HTML 4.01 according to the w3 validator. Tomcat happily serves up pages up to 48K in size, but above that size it returns an error to the browser: -

RE: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more than 48K in size

2006-10-31 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Alistair McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more than 48K in size > > Tomcat happily serves up pages up to 48K in size, but above > that size it returns an error to the browser: There's an interesting 48k settin

RE: (FIXED) RE: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more than 48K in size

2006-10-31 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Alistair McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: (FIXED) RE: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more than > 48K in size > > Thanks for that. Solved the problem nicely. By the way, I just tested with a 78k static HTML page on a near stock 5.5.20, and did not experi