nFactory"/>
>
> With this, the 5.5.9 manager lists the UserTransaction. But I want to use
a
> actual version of tomcat.
>
> Should the manager list the UserTransaction if it is configured under
5.5.25
> or 6.0.14 with
> ?
>
> regards,
> Peter
> --
> View
:
http://www.nabble.com/no-UserTransaction-in-jndi-tf4763485.html#a13644275
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
xt:
http://www.nabble.com/no-UserTransaction-in-jndi-tf4763485.html#a13643926
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
in
171ms.
08 Nov 2007 10:27:10 [DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-9] INFO
org.jstripe.tomcat.probe.model.stats.StatsCollection - stats serialized in
31ms.
08 Nov 2007 10:28:10 [DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-9] INFO
org.jstripe.tomcat.probe.model.stats.StatsCollection - stats serialized in
32ms.
>
To: "Tomcat Users List"
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 8:49 AM
Subject: RE: no UserTransaction in jndi
> From: Peter Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: no UserTransaction in jndi
>
> For this I added to the in the server.xml
> factory="
> From: Peter Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: no UserTransaction in jndi
>
> For this I added to the in the server.xml
> factory="com.atomikos.icatch.jta.UserTransactionFactory"
> />
According to the Tomcat doc, the only valid attribute is fac
ker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:447)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
I tried it also with 5.5.25, but the result is the same.
Where is my mistake?
regards,
Peter
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/no-UserTransaction-in-jndi-tf4763485.html#a13623730
Sent from t
