Re: multiple instances on a server

2010-08-30 Thread Rainer Frey
On Saturday 28 August 2010 00:11:11 Rainer Jung wrote: > On 27.08.2010 21:58, Wesley Acheson wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Pid wrote: > >> On 27/08/2010 18:51, Wesley Acheson wrote: > >>> I think the reason for doing this in ruby is that ruby is single > >>> threaded, I've been told.

Re: multiple instances on a server

2010-08-27 Thread Rainer Jung
On 27.08.2010 21:58, Wesley Acheson wrote: On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Pid wrote: On 27/08/2010 18:51, Wesley Acheson wrote: I think the reason for doing this in ruby is that ruby is single threaded, I've been told. The JVM isn't. I'm raising an eyebrow. Huh? Adding unqualified rum

Re: multiple instances on a server

2010-08-27 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ahmed, On 8/27/2010 12:57 PM, S Ahmed wrote: > If you have a server with 15 GB of ram (or any large number for arguments > sake), does it ever make sense to run multiple instances of tomcat on the > same server? (serving http requests for the same we

Re: multiple instances on a server

2010-08-27 Thread Wesley Acheson
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Pid wrote: > On 27/08/2010 18:51, Wesley Acheson wrote: >> I think the reason for doing this in ruby is that ruby is single >> threaded, I've been told. The JVM isn't. > > I'm raising an eyebrow. > Huh?

Re: multiple instances on a server

2010-08-27 Thread Pid
On 27/08/2010 18:51, Wesley Acheson wrote: > I think the reason for doing this in ruby is that ruby is single > threaded, I've been told. The JVM isn't. I'm raising an eyebrow. > This is of course muddied with Jruby. > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3086467/confused-are-languages-like-

RE: multiple instances on a server

2010-08-27 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Wesley Acheson [mailto:wesley.ache...@gmail.com] > Subject: Re: multiple instances on a server > I believe that they'll both end up running in the same JVM > also but again could be wrong. No, separate Tomcat instances would run in separate JVM instances (processes).

Re: multiple instances on a server

2010-08-27 Thread Wesley Acheson
I think the reason for doing this in ruby is that ruby is single threaded, I've been told. The JVM isn't. This is of course muddied with Jruby. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3086467/confused-are-languages-like-python-ruby-single-threaded-unlike-say-java-for Anyway I don't see any reason

RE: multiple instances on a server

2010-08-27 Thread Jeffrey Janner
7 AM > To: users@tomcat.apache.org > Subject: multiple instances on a server > > Hi, > > If you have a server with 15 GB of ram (or any large number for > arguments > sake), does it ever make sense to run multiple instances of tomcat on > the > same server? (serving htt

Re: multiple instances on a server

2010-08-27 Thread Pid
On 27/08/2010 17:57, S Ahmed wrote: > Hi, > > If you have a server with 15 GB of ram (or any large number for arguments > sake), does it ever make sense to run multiple instances of tomcat on the > same server? (serving http requests for the same web application) If you have a 64bit JVM, probabl

multiple instances on a server

2010-08-27 Thread S Ahmed
Hi, If you have a server with 15 GB of ram (or any large number for arguments sake), does it ever make sense to run multiple instances of tomcat on the same server? (serving http requests for the same web application) Or can a single instance utilize all the server resources just fine efficientl