Re: mod_jk log level and logging issues

2006-08-09 Thread Peter Rossbach
Hi Rainer, really good idea to fix the worker logging ++1... === Peter Rainer Jung schrieb: Hi, thanks for the feedback. Good info! fredk2 schrieb: issue 1: With mod_jk 1.2.15 i set my jk log level: JkLogFile logs/mod_jk.log #JkLogLevel info JkRequestLogFormat "%w

Re: mod_jk log level and logging issues

2006-08-09 Thread fredk2
a missing jsp/html and thus a 404, when tomcat is down it says 200 which means, according to the mod_jk.log, that it is working when in reality it is not :-) . Yes, I would expect 50x. thanks, Fred -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk-log-level-and-logging-issues-tf20

Re: mod_jk log level and logging issues

2006-08-09 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi, thanks for the feedback. Good info! fredk2 schrieb: > issue 1: > > > With mod_jk 1.2.15 i set my jk log level: > > JkLogFile logs/mod_jk.log > #JkLogLevel info > JkRequestLogFormat "%w %V %U %s %T %B %H %m" > > While switching to 1.2.18 I read in the fine manual that t

mod_jk log level and logging issues

2006-08-08 Thread fredk2
quot;. Also any url that would normally show a status of "404" show "200" when tomcat is down. This is a bit unexpected but it appears that 1.2.15 is doing the same. Hence a broken tomcat can actually make a log stat look very good :) Thanks, Fred -- View this message in co