Re: mod_jk and 304

2009-03-20 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 André, On 3/20/2009 8:02 AM, André Cruz wrote: > I'm running apache 2.2.9, mod_jk 1.2.27 and tomcat 6.0.18 and I get this > problem > as well: > > GET /shibboleth-idp/SSO HTTP/1.1 [snip] > HTTP/1.1 302 Moved Temporarily > Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11

Re: mod_jk and 304

2009-03-20 Thread André Cruz
Rainer Jung kippdata.de> writes: > On 09.03.2009 18:07, Anthony J. Biacco wrote: > > Download the latest, configure, make, make install, check for > > new/deprecated directives in the jk docs, modify configs accordingly, > > reload apache. I'm running apache 2.2.9, mod_jk 1.2.27 and tomcat 6.0.1

Re: mod_jk and 304

2009-03-09 Thread Rainer Jung
On 09.03.2009 18:07, Anthony J. Biacco wrote: Download the latest, configure, make, make install, check for new/deprecated directives in the jk docs, modify configs accordingly, reload apache. +1 Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-ma

RE: mod_jk and 304

2009-03-09 Thread Anthony J. Biacco
://www.formatdynamics.com -Original Message- From: Eqbal [mailto:eqb...@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 10:07 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: mod_jk and 304 Thanks for the tip Rainer. The version I have is 1.2.6-dev So in order to update to a newer version, do I just download the latest and copy

Re: mod_jk and 304

2009-03-09 Thread Eqbal
: mod_jk and 304 On 07.03.2009 22:22, Anthony J. Biacco wrote: > If you have your jkloglevel set to at least info, the modjk log file > (whatever you have it set to) will show the jk version when apache is > started or reloaded Old versions unfortunately did not :( If you know where the mod

Re: mod_jk and 304

2009-03-08 Thread Rainer Jung
learn that from looking at the LoadMofdule line for mod_jk), you can use strings mod_jk.so | fgrep 1.2. Regards, Rainer -Original Message- From: Eqbal Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 2:13 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: mod_jk and 304 Yes I tested on newer version as well, but

RE: mod_jk and 304

2009-03-07 Thread Anthony J. Biacco
Users List Subject: Re: mod_jk and 304 Yes I tested on newer version as well, but could not reproduce it there. The extra bytes are not content and they are always the same regardless of what resource is requested. How do I find the mod_jk version? It came with the suse distribution. I tried

Re: mod_jk and 304

2009-03-07 Thread Eqbal
t the version. - Original Message From: Len Popp To: Tomcat Users List Sent: Saturday, March 7, 2009 9:18:49 AM Subject: Re: mod_jk and 304 I'm not seeing that problem on my system, but I'm running newer versions (httpd 2.2.9 and Tomcat 6.0.18). I do recall seeing some strang

Re: mod_jk and 304

2009-03-07 Thread Len Popp
any problems, but if > the css and js files are in tomcat, apache always seem to append some bytes > in the message body when there is a 304 response. > > > - Original Message > From: Eqbal > To: users@tomcat.apache.org > Sent: Friday, March 6, 2009 3:51:24 PM

Re: mod_jk and 304

2009-03-06 Thread Eqbal
re in tomcat, apache always seem to append some bytes in the message body when there is a 304 response. - Original Message From: Eqbal To: users@tomcat.apache.org Sent: Friday, March 6, 2009 3:51:24 PM Subject: mod_jk and 304 I have tomcat running behind apache http server 2.0 using m

mod_jk and 304

2009-03-06 Thread Eqbal
I have tomcat running behind apache http server 2.0 using mod_jk. I have noticed that this causes any response to request for files in tomcat that return a 304 status code, to also have a 20 byte message body attached to the response. This causes our load balancer to think this is an error as a