mod_jk + SSL

I haven't really found any documentation on getting mod_jk to work together. I have managed to get my apache server to provide an https connection to my tomcat's server regular HTTP 8080. Is this the correct way to do it? Or can I connect to my tomcat server on port 8443? I can live with this co

Re: Is this possibe? mod_jk <==SSL==> AJP/1.3

t strictement interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer ou de le reproduire. - Original Message - From: "dfelicia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 11:07 PM Subject: Re: Is this possibe? mod_jk <==SSL==> AJP/1.3 > >>Tomcat currently does

Re: Is this possibe? mod_jk <==SSL==> AJP/1.3

>Tomcat currently does not support encryption. Huh? Sure it does. I think you mean AJP doesn't support encryption. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-this-possibe---mod_jk-%3C%3D%3DSSL%3D%3D%3E-AJP-1.3-tf2776640.html#a7769280 Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list arch

Re: Is this possibe? mod_jk <==SSL==> AJP/1.3

"dfelicia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Not true; see >> > > Interesting. I'll need to look into mod_proxy, further. But what about > performance? I've not tested it in a long while, but last I tr

Re: Is this possibe? mod_jk <==SSL==> AJP/1.3

>Not true; see Interesting. I'll need to look into mod_proxy, further. But what about performance? I've not tested it in a long while, but last I tried it was slower that mod_jk. BTW, does Apache 2.2's new mod_proxy_ajp support en

Re: Is this possibe? mod_jk <==SSL==> AJP/1.3

ooops - I need to spend more time reading the fine manual :-) tx for the reminder :) Hassan Schroeder-2 wrote: > > On 12/8/06, fredk2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> although I have not tested this personally, but I was told that mod_proxy >> (_ajp) does not have the Auto Flush option that y

Re: Is this possibe? mod_jk <==SSL==> AJP/1.3

On 12/8/06, fredk2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: although I have not tested this personally, but I was told that mod_proxy (_ajp) does not have the Auto Flush option that you can set with mod_jk and thus creates problem for streaming applications. You might want to look at the "flushpackets" par

Re: Is this possibe? mod_jk <==SSL==> AJP/1.3

Hi, although I have not tested this personally, but I was told that mod_proxy (_ajp) does not have the Auto Flush option that you can set with mod_jk and thus creates problem for streaming applications. I wonder if others came accross this problem ? Rgds - Fred Hassan Schroeder-2 wrote: > >

Re: Is this possibe? mod_jk <==SSL==> AJP/1.3

On 12/7/06, dfelicia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: mod_proxy is ... It also doesn't offer load-balancing, Not true; see I've used this recently (with mod_proxy_ajp) and it worked fine. :-) FWIW, -- Hassan Schroeder

Re: Is this possibe? mod_jk <==SSL==> AJP/1.3

>As far as have seen there is no SSL support for AJP/1.3 - the trafic is in clear between the Apache and tomcat using >mod_jk. > >I guess with apache 2 you can use mod_proxy and ssl to a tomcat using the http connector with ssl. Thanks for the reply, Fred. I feared that was the answer. The prob

Re: Is this possibe? mod_jk <==SSL==> AJP/1.3

essage - > From: "dfelicia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 2:46 PM > Subject: Is this possibe? mod_jk <==SSL==> AJP/1.3 > > >> >> Can traffic between mod_jk and Tomcat's AJP connector be encrypted &g

Re: Is this possibe? mod_jk <==SSL==> AJP/1.3

ecember 07, 2006 2:46 PM Subject: Is this possibe? mod_jk <==SSL==> AJP/1.3 > > Can traffic between mod_jk and Tomcat's AJP connector be encrypted (without > using ssh/stunnel)? > > I see SSL mentioned in the doc for AJP, but it's clear as mud: > http://tomcat.a

Is this possibe? mod_jk <==SSL==> AJP/1.3

Can traffic between mod_jk and Tomcat's AJP connector be encrypted (without using ssh/stunnel)? I see SSL mentioned in the doc for AJP, but it's clear as mud: http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/config/ajp.html So, in Apache, I am using SSL and mod_jk. I set these parameters per the mod_jk