RE: mod_jk, not sure if an issue

2009-04-25 Thread Martin Gainty
Bindungswirkung. Aufgrund der leichten Manipulierbarkeit von E-Mails koennen wir keine Haftung fuer den Inhalt uebernehmen. > Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 01:43:58 +0200 > From: rainer.j...@kippdata.de > To: users@tomcat.apache.org > Subject: Re: mod_jk, not sure if an issue > >

Re: mod_jk, not sure if an issue

2009-04-25 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi André, On 25.04.2009 13:58, André Warnier wrote: > Hi Rainer. > > Thanks very much for the time you took to analyse the case below. > However, I am still puzzled : > > This is indeed a system where there appear to be problems at the level > of the connection between the client workstations/br

Re: mod_jk, not sure if an issue

2009-04-25 Thread André Warnier
Hi Rainer. Thanks very much for the time you took to analyse the case below. However, I am still puzzled : This is indeed a system where there appear to be problems at the level of the connection between the client workstations/browser, and the distant server. Those are the "client write" err

Re: mod_jk, not sure if an issue

2009-04-24 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi André, On 22.04.2009 18:29, André Warnier wrote: > As (maybe) part of another issue which I am still trying to track down > with the concerned network people (client write errors, Sample 2 below), Before commenting Sample 1: Although we generally respond to the "client errors" topic with "User

mod_jk, not sure if an issue

2009-04-22 Thread André Warnier
Hi. As (maybe) part of another issue which I am still trying to track down with the concerned network people (client write errors, Sample 2 below), I find the following kind of messages regularly in the mod_jk logfile (Sample 1). I just want to know if this indicates a problem somewhere, or if