-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
James,
On 2/24/14, 11:43 AM, James H. H. Lampert wrote:
> On 2/24/14 8:33 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: . . .
>> I've worked with Tomcat on Windows, Linux, Solaris, FreeBSD,
>> HP-UX and some more unusual hardware like plug-computers. By far
>> the biggest
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Leo,
On 2/24/14, 10:59 AM, Leo Donahue wrote:
> In general, is it assumed that all responses given to the list
> assume the OP is running a version of Linux, if they don't state
> the OS?
In general, when I read a post where the OP does not state t
On 2/24/14 8:33 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
. . .
I've worked with Tomcat on Windows, Linux, Solaris, FreeBSD, HP-UX and
some more unusual hardware like plug-computers. By far the biggest issue
the first time I hit a new OS is figuring out how to do stuff in that OS.
. . .
And I have a fair amount o
On 24/02/2014 16:33, Mark Thomas wrote:
> That was more me picking an OS to respond to on the basis of my mode at
> the time rather than an expectation of Linux.
s/mode/mood/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.
On 24/02/2014 16:15, David kerber wrote:
> On 2/24/2014 10:59 AM, Leo Donahue wrote:
>> In general, is it assumed that all responses given to the list assume
>> the OP is running a version of Linux, if they don't state the OS?
>>
>> For example, I read the post about "Tomcat upgrades/security patch
On 2/24/2014 10:59 AM, Leo Donahue wrote:
In general, is it assumed that all responses given to the list assume
the OP is running a version of Linux, if they don't state the OS?
For example, I read the post about "Tomcat upgrades/security patching
best practices" and the advice given is to modif
In general, is it assumed that all responses given to the list assume
the OP is running a version of Linux, if they don't state the OS?
For example, I read the post about "Tomcat upgrades/security patching
best practices" and the advice given is to modify init.d script. I
don't recall seeing the
