Re: httpd vs. Tomcat performance

2010-03-27 Thread Auser99
- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/httpd-vs.-Tomcat-performance-tp2802

Re: httpd vs. Tomcat performance

2010-03-27 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2010/3/27 André Warnier : >> >> > Might this not also be worth preserving in the Tomcat FAQ/wiki ? > There is http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/FAQ/Performance_and_Monitoring

Re: httpd vs. Tomcat performance

2010-03-27 Thread André Warnier
Hassan Schroeder wrote: Just to get this into the archives for the next time it comes up because I don't know if the author (a certain "mthomas") will mention it here.

Re: httpd vs. Tomcat performance

2010-03-25 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jason, On 3/25/2010 3:01 AM, Jason Brittain wrote: > Chris: there are no units on your results numbers, and I'm not seeing > any procedure you used, nor any configurations you used, so I'm not sure how > to interpret the numbers. I'd be happy to give

Re: httpd vs. Tomcat performance

2010-03-25 Thread Mark Thomas
On 25/03/2010 17:47, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Mark, > > On 3/24/2010 8:50 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 25/03/2010 00:26, Hassan Schroeder wrote: >>> Just to get this into the archives for the next time it comes up >>> >>>

Re: httpd vs. Tomcat performance

2010-03-25 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark, On 3/24/2010 8:50 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 25/03/2010 00:26, Hassan Schroeder wrote: >> Just to get this into the archives for the next time it comes up >> >>

Re: httpd vs. Tomcat performance

2010-03-25 Thread Mark Thomas
On 25/03/2010 07:01, Jason Brittain wrote: > Very entertaining reading! Thanks Chris and Mark for re-benchmarking, > explaining, and giving your opinions on the results. I'm not entirely sure > how I missed Chris' benchmark results email, almost exactly one year ago > now. Chris: there are no un

Re: httpd vs. Tomcat performance

2010-03-25 Thread Mark Thomas
On 25/03/2010 01:39, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> Chris deserves a lot of the credit. Without his figures, it is just opinion. > > That's the second benchmark that I see today that has odd numbers. What did you think was odd? Mark ---

Re: httpd vs. Tomcat performance

2010-03-25 Thread Marian Simpetru
Hi , We have a online shop developed as a suite of JSR168 portlets. On some portlets we list products and images (so there are about 25 images per page + other images). One image has around 250k. Performance was greatly improved after we put apache httpd in front (images served by apache & gzippe

Re: httpd vs. Tomcat performance

2010-03-25 Thread Jason Brittain
Very entertaining reading! Thanks Chris and Mark for re-benchmarking, explaining, and giving your opinions on the results. I'm not entirely sure how I missed Chris' benchmark results email, almost exactly one year ago now. Chris: there are no units on your results numbers, and I'm not seeing any

Re: httpd vs. Tomcat performance

2010-03-24 Thread Rémy Maucherat
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > Chris deserves a lot of the credit. Without his figures, it is just opinion. That's the second benchmark that I see today that has odd numbers. Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail

Re: httpd vs. Tomcat performance

2010-03-24 Thread Mark Thomas
On 25/03/2010 00:26, Hassan Schroeder wrote: > Just to get this into the archives for the next time it comes up > > > > because I don't know if the author (a certain "mth

httpd vs. Tomcat performance

2010-03-24 Thread Hassan Schroeder
Just to get this into the archives for the next time it comes up because I don't know if the author (a certain "mthomas") will mention it here. :-) (via @springsource