> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 10:21 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: httpd/Tomcat load balancing question
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
&g
On 1/5/11 4:21 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> In this case, only gain.
> I see some opportunities for loss: see above.
:)
p
0x62590808.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pid,
Late to the thread. :(
On 12/23/2010 5:37 AM, Pid wrote:
> On 23/12/2010 07:49, André Warnier wrote:
>> So in clear everyday English, for the benefit of the oppressed minority
>> who does not speak JSTL fluently, the fact of encoding this link i
55 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: httpd/Tomcat load balancing question
>
> > From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
> > Subject: RE: httpd/Tomcat load balancing question
>
> >
> > default
> > /static/*
&
> From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
> Subject: RE: httpd/Tomcat load balancing question
>
> default
> /static/*
>
> This is supposed to send anything that comes in as /static/ to the
> default servlet for Tomcat to
ing?
Jeff
> -Original Message-
> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 7:15 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: httpd/Tomcat load balancing question
>
> I'll top post and reply to an earlier message at the same time,
> -Original Message-
> From: Konstantin Kolinko [mailto:knst.koli...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 5:07 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: httpd/Tomcat load balancing question
>
> 2010/12/23 Pid :
> > On 23/12/2010 07:49, André Warn
the
URL?
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 4:50 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: httpd/Tomcat load balancing question
In the specific case I mention below, this is the source from the js
2010/12/23 Pid :
> On 23/12/2010 07:49, André Warnier wrote:
>> Pid * wrote:
>>> On 22 Dec 2010, at 23:38, André Warnier wrote:
>>>
Pid * wrote:
> On 22 Dec 2010, at 23:02, Jeffrey Janner
> wrote:
>> Definitely the culprit. Now, I just have to convince the Dev team
>> that t
On 23/12/2010 07:49, André Warnier wrote:
> Pid * wrote:
>> On 22 Dec 2010, at 23:38, André Warnier wrote:
>>
>>> Pid * wrote:
On 22 Dec 2010, at 23:02, Jeffrey Janner
wrote:
> Definitely the culprit. Now, I just have to convince the Dev team
> that they are, once again, a bunc
On 23.12.2010 00:08, Pid * wrote:
On 22 Dec 2010, at 23:02, Jeffrey Janner wrote:
Definitely the culprit. Now, I just have to convince the Dev team that they
are, once again, a bunch of idiots.
Fail.
I'm sure it's some framework/tool they are using. The question now is, if I
can't get
Pid * wrote:
On 22 Dec 2010, at 23:38, André Warnier wrote:
Pid * wrote:
On 22 Dec 2010, at 23:02, Jeffrey Janner wrote:
Definitely the culprit. Now, I just have to convince the Dev team that they
are, once again, a bunch of idiots.
Fail.
Pid,
why /do/ the "static objects" links embedde
On 22 Dec 2010, at 23:38, André Warnier wrote:
> Pid * wrote:
>> On 22 Dec 2010, at 23:02, Jeffrey Janner wrote:
>>> Definitely the culprit. Now, I just have to convince the Dev team that
>>> they are, once again, a bunch of idiots.
>> Fail.
> Pid,
> why /do/ the "static objects" links embedde
Pid * wrote:
On 22 Dec 2010, at 23:02, Jeffrey Janner wrote:
Definitely the culprit. Now, I just have to convince the Dev team that they
are, once again, a bunch of idiots.
Fail.
Pid,
why /do/ the "static objects" links embedded in the login page get back to the browser
with a jsessioni
f
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 4:50 PM
>> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
>> Subject: RE: httpd/Tomcat load balancing question
>>
>> In the specific case
2, 2010 4:50 PM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: httpd/Tomcat load balancing question
>
> In the specific case I mention below, this is the source from the jsp:
> " />
>
> I'm not a jsp programmer, but I'm betting it has something to d
; Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 4:40 PM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'; 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: httpd/Tomcat load balancing question
>
> Thanks, that was what I was thinking.
> Since the only JSP I have access to is the welcome-file, I'm not sur
Addendum.
You could also write the links as
(without leading "/"). That would keep them relative to the current app, and cause less
work if you ever want to call the application other than "Portal".
You could also put the static elements in your app under Tomcat.
Unless there are lots of the
22, 2010 2:43 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: httpd/Tomcat load balancing question
>
> Hi.
>
> Not knowing anything about JSP per se, I would nevertheless guess that
> the links are
> written using something like
> or similarly, instead
> of just plain html
&g
Hi.
Not knowing anything about JSP per se, I would nevertheless guess that the links are
written using something like
or similarly, instead of just plain html
.
That probably leads the JSP compiler to think it has to "relativise" the links to the app
context and so on, while in this case it s
Httpd 2.2.17
Tomcat 6.0.29
Sun JDK 1.6.0_22
Spring Framework (3.0.2 I think)
All on Windows
The Dev team is creating a new app that we are planning to deploy using httpd
as a load-balancer to two Tomcats on separate servers. Httpd is configured to
serve static files - graphics, css, etc. - with
21 matches
Mail list logo
