Yes, I am using 7.0.4. Will create a entry in the bugzila system
Thanks.
2010/10/28 Mark Thomas
> On 28/10/2010 02:20, Ivan wrote:
> > Thanks for clarifying it, so do the devs have plan for it ?
>
> Yes. What? Fix it. When? TBD.
>
> Creating a bugzilla entry will ensure it doesn't get forgotten.
On 28/10/2010 02:20, Ivan wrote:
> Thanks for clarifying it, so do the devs have plan for it ?
Yes. What? Fix it. When? TBD.
Creating a bugzilla entry will ensure it doesn't get forgotten.
I see you still haven't told us which version you are using. I assume
you've tested 7.0.4.
Mark
> Hope it
Thanks for clarifying it, so do the devs have plan for it ?
Hope it could be fixed soon.
2010/10/27 Mark Thomas
> On 27/10/2010 06:43, Ivan wrote:
> > Hi,
> > While calling the method destory() on the StandardContext directly,
> it
> > seems that the method destoryInternal() is called twice
Thanks for clarifying it, does the devs have plan for it ? Hope it could be
fixed soon.
2010/10/27 Mark Thomas
> On 27/10/2010 06:43, Ivan wrote:
> > Hi,
> > While calling the method destory() on the StandardContext directly,
> it
> > seems that the method destoryInternal() is called twice i
On 27/10/2010 06:43, Ivan wrote:
> Hi,
> While calling the method destory() on the StandardContext directly, it
> seems that the method destoryInternal() is called twice in the
> LifecycleMBeanBase, the two stacktraces are below :
> a. LifecycleMBeanBase.unregister(ObjectName) line: 191
>
Hi,
While calling the method destory() on the StandardContext directly, it
seems that the method destoryInternal() is called twice in the
LifecycleMBeanBase, the two stacktraces are below :
a. LifecycleMBeanBase.unregister(ObjectName) line: 191
LifecycleMBeanBase.destroyInternal()