RE: context.xml vs ROOT.xml

2013-04-30 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Jason Aleski [mailto:jason.ale...@gmail.com] > Subject: Re: context.xml vs ROOT.xml Don't top post. > I believe it is being ignored because it doesn't see the database > connection when it is in the META-INF/context.xml. I believe you must be doing something else

Re: context.xml vs ROOT.xml

2013-04-30 Thread Jason Aleski
INF method would work. I guess I will stay with placing the configurations in the ROOT.XML. -JA- On 4/30/2013 1:16 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: From: Jason Aleski [mailto:jason.ale...@gmail.com] Subject: context.xml vs ROOT.xml I've got my configurations stored in the META-INF/contex

RE: context.xml vs ROOT.xml

2013-04-30 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Jason Aleski [mailto:jason.ale...@gmail.com] > Subject: context.xml vs ROOT.xml > I've got my configurations stored in the META-INF/context.xml > file, but because I'm not deploying my application as a WAR, > the context.xml is ignored. Why do you think it&#x

context.xml vs ROOT.xml

2013-04-30 Thread Jason Aleski
I'm wanting to configure a database connection. I've got my configurations stored in the META-INF/context.xml file, but because I'm not deploying my application as a WAR, the context.xml is ignored. I can copy my application's context.xml and place it in the tomcat/conf/context.xml and it wor