Re: apache2.2 tomcat5.5.27 Windows 2008 virtual hosts

2009-08-18 Thread java piet
/192.168.210.143:8081/ gives a network timeout. > >>> > >>> Tomcat without the Apache http server service gives the same network > >>> > >> timeout > >> > >>> when accessed through 8081. > >>> > >>> Hope thi

Re: apache2.2 tomcat5.5.27 Windows 2008 virtual hosts

2009-08-17 Thread java piet
gt; >>> On the other hand, when I use the ip address like > >>> http://192.168.210.143:8080/ > >>> I get the resource (/) not found error > >>> while http://192.168.210.143:8081/ gives a network timeout. > >>> > >>> Tomcat without

Re: apache2.2 tomcat5.5.27 Windows 2008 virtual hosts

2009-08-17 Thread David Smith
meout >> >>> when accessed through 8081. >>> >>> Hope this gives a clearer picture. >>> >>> Kind regards. >>> >>> Piet >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Caldarale, Charles R < >>&g

Re: apache2.2 tomcat5.5.27 Windows 2008 virtual hosts

2009-08-17 Thread java piet
; > > > Piet > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Caldarale, Charles R < > > chuck.caldar...@unisys.com> wrote: > > > > > >>> From: java piet [mailto:javap...@gmail.com] > >>> Subject: Re: apache2.2 tomcat5.5.27 Wind

Re: apache2.2 tomcat5.5.27 Windows 2008 virtual hosts

2009-08-17 Thread David Smith
; > chuck.caldar...@unisys.com> wrote: > > >>> From: java piet [mailto:javap...@gmail.com] >>> Subject: Re: apache2.2 tomcat5.5.27 Windows 2008 virtual hosts >>> >>> The reason for the Apache http server is because I thought I >>> need it to h

Re: apache2.2 tomcat5.5.27 Windows 2008 virtual hosts

2009-08-16 Thread java piet
ect: Re: apache2.2 tomcat5.5.27 Windows 2008 virtual hosts > > > > The reason for the Apache http server is because I thought I > > need it to handle the virtual hosting. > > No, Tomcat can handle that quite well: > http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/virtual-hosting-h

RE: apache2.2 tomcat5.5.27 Windows 2008 virtual hosts

2009-08-16 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: java piet [mailto:javap...@gmail.com] > Subject: Re: apache2.2 tomcat5.5.27 Windows 2008 virtual hosts > > The reason for the Apache http server is because I thought I > need it to handle the virtual hosting. No, Tomcat can handle that quite well: http://tomcat.apache.org

Re: apache2.2 tomcat5.5.27 Windows 2008 virtual hosts

2009-08-16 Thread java piet
Hi André, Thank you so much for the quick response. I will check your feedback as soon as I have access to the server again. The reason for the Apache http server is because I thought I need it to handle the virtual hosting. As for the port 80, something else is already using it on the server.

Re: apache2.2 tomcat5.5.27 Windows 2008 virtual hosts

2009-08-16 Thread André Warnier
Piet, Thanks for providing all the information needed to help you. Not everyone does, and it's a p. in the a. But your configuration is a bit strange. Actually, it cannot work the way it is described, because you have both Apache httpd AND Apache Tomcat (2 different processes) trying to "liste

apache2.2 tomcat5.5.27 Windows 2008 virtual hosts

2009-08-16 Thread java piet
Dear all, This is the first time I have to set up a web application (Struts 1.1) and I have been hung up with this problem for days. I have searched and read every how to and other forum, mail list, blog I could find and I am probably misunderstanding something very obvious and simple. I have a W