Re: antioJarLocking not working

2008-10-31 Thread James Ravn
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:52 PM, Caldarale, Charles R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> From: James Ravn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: antioJarLocking not working >> >> jruby-rack makes a call to the ServletContext's getRootPath() method > > No

RE: antioJarLocking not working

2008-10-30 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: James Ravn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: antioJarLocking not working > > jruby-rack makes a call to the ServletContext's getRootPath() method No such animal; perhaps you mean getRealPath()? > It looks like this is returning the erroneous "/temp-appna

Re: antioJarLocking not working

2008-10-30 Thread James Ravn
> From: Aaron Axelsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List > Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:39:46 -0500 > Subject: Re: antioJarLocking not working > I tried sticking the jars there - but it did not seem to make any > difference. > > Let me recap on what we are

Re: antioJarLocking not working

2008-09-18 Thread Vikas Sharma
using tomcat 6.018. Vikas -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/antioJarLocking-not-working-tp19187318p19565053.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To start a new topic, e-mail

Re: antioJarLocking not working

2008-08-31 Thread Johnny Kewl
- Original Message - From: "Aaron Axelsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Users List" Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 9:39 PM Subject: Re: antioJarLocking not working I tried sticking the jars there - but it did not seem to make any difference. Let me reca

Re: antioJarLocking not working

2008-08-31 Thread Aaron Axelsen
From: "Aaron Axelsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "Tomcat Users List" >> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 10:19 PM >> Subject: Re: antioJarLocking not working >> >> >> >>> The jar's its probably having issues with

Re: antioJarLocking not working

2008-08-28 Thread Mark Thomas
Johnny Kewl wrote: > > - Original Message - From: "Aaron Axelsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Tomcat Users List" > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 10:19 PM > Subject: Re: antioJarLocking not working > > >> The jar's its proba

Re: antioJarLocking not working

2008-08-28 Thread Johnny Kewl
- Original Message - From: "Aaron Axelsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Users List" Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 10:19 PM Subject: Re: antioJarLocking not working The jar's its probably having issues with are jruby-complete-1.1.3.jar and jruby

Re: antioJarLocking not working

2008-08-28 Thread Aaron Axelsen
The jar's its probably having issues with are jruby-complete-1.1.3.jar and jruby-rack-0.9.1.jar since those are the ones that were getting locked. Any suggestions on anything else I can try to attempt to resolve it? -- Aaron Mark Thomas wrote: > Aaron Axelsen wrote: > >> I set the workdir on

Re: antioJarLocking not working

2008-08-28 Thread Mark Thomas
Aaron Axelsen wrote: > I set the workdir on the global context - I can see that files are being > created there, however that same error still exists. For some reason it > insists on looking in Tomcat 6\temp-Foo5 > > Any suggestions? It looks like a bug in the jar. It might be using a non-portab

Re: antioJarLocking not working

2008-08-27 Thread Aaron Axelsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I set the workdir on the global context - I can see that files are being created there, however that same error still exists. For some reason it insists on looking in Tomcat 6\temp-Foo5 Any suggestions? Mark Thomas wrote: | Aaron Axelsen wrote:

Re: antioJarLocking not working

2008-08-27 Thread Mark Thomas
Aaron Axelsen wrote: > I understand how it works - the problem is that the folder is not > actually getting created. I double checked permissions - and the apache > user does have full permissions to that tomcat 6 folder. Any thoughts? > > The name of the war is temp Foo5.war. I can see folders

Re: antioJarLocking not working

2008-08-27 Thread Aaron Axelsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I understand how it works - the problem is that the folder is not actually getting created. I double checked permissions - and the apache user does have full permissions to that tomcat 6 folder. Any thoughts? The name of the war is temp Foo5.war.

Re: antioJarLocking not working

2008-08-27 Thread Mark Thomas
Aaron Axelsen wrote: > Is there any reason its going to look in temp-Foo5? That is how the antiresource locking works. It copies the entire war to a temp location with a unique name and runs it from there. If you reload it would probably use temp-Foo6 etc. Mark -

Re: antioJarLocking not working

2008-08-27 Thread Aaron Axelsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The reason we have docbase == appbase is because students will upload war files to the doc base for deployment within a given subdomain. However, that said, there is no reason why we need to set the context path at all, since the war files all dep

Re: antioJarLocking not working

2008-08-27 Thread Mark Thomas
Aaron Axelsen wrote: > Is there a trick to get antiJarLocking and antiResourceLocking to work > with tomcat 6? I have the following in the config: > > ~unpackWARs="true" autoDeploy="true"> > ~ antiResourceLocking="true" /> Setting docBase==appBase is going to get you a world of pain. I

antioJarLocking not working

2008-08-27 Thread Aaron Axelsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Is there a trick to get antiJarLocking and antiResourceLocking to work with tomcat 6? I have the following in the config: ~antiResourceLocking="true" /> ~ ~ There do not appear to be any error logs on anything, but the jar's