-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
Tony Anecito wrote:
> Actually I just saw some reports on the new quad intel 45nm
> processors and they are much faster than 15msec.
Yes, but the windows timer resolution sucks. :(
> To justify new hardware and predict scalability Capacity Pla
Tony Anecito wrote:
Actually I just saw some reports on the new quad intel
45nm processors and they are much faster than 15msec.
To justify new hardware and predict scalability
Capacity Planning groups have to show the before/after
performance.
I have seen web apps operate in the 4msec range on
Actually I just saw some reports on the new quad intel
45nm processors and they are much faster than 15msec.
To justify new hardware and predict scalability
Capacity Planning groups have to show the before/after
performance.
I have seen web apps operate in the 4msec range on
comercial servlet con
Tony Anecito wrote:
Hi All,
I am using Tomcat 6.0.14 with java 1.6.0_02 on Windows
2000 professional.
I am wondering what is the best parser to use for this
configuration? The one with java 1.6.0_02?
for XML?
the Sun JRE implements the Xerces and Xalan parsers, so it would be the
same as i
Hi All,
I am using Tomcat 6.0.14 with java 1.6.0_02 on Windows
2000 professional.
I am wondering what is the best parser to use for this
configuration? The one with java 1.6.0_02?
Also, what is the best way to monitor performance? I
am using the logs and they are only 15msec resolution.
I am sur
