-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Broken,
broken connection wrote:
> As I told before,its a simple web app for the BA's just for some proof of
> concept and if I try to get too techie.
If this is a POC, why not just walk over to their computers and install
the JRE and Tomcat manually
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark,
Mark H. Wood wrote:
> Wearing my sysadmin. hat: I would say that it is perfectly okay for
> your install package to *use* its own copy of JRE to run its own copy of
> Ant to install your product. It is NOT OKAY to leave these behind
> like mud
Are you sure that you even have a problem?
Yes, certainly i do ... :(
Thanks a lot Mark...that was some excellent stuff there...but see there's
some difference between making a installer for a production level software
or making one for demo purpose...
As I told before,its a simple web app
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 01:06:04PM -0400, broken connection wrote:
> At the end, the only thing that should matter to TOMCAT or ANT is that they
> should be able to find the classes in the JREso I don't understand, why
> you guys don't recommend this
Because if everybody did it that way, c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Broken,
broken connection wrote:
> At the end, the only thing that should matter to TOMCAT or ANT is that they
> should be able to find the classes in the JRE...
Tomcat and Ant don't need to be able to fine JRE classes. When the JRE
starts up, it wil
> From: broken connection [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Tomcat and JRE redistribution
>
> At the end, the only thing that should matter to TOMCAT or
> ANT is that they should be able to find the classes in the
> JREso I don't understand, why you guys
Thanks a lot Chris, Steve and Charles,
I really appreciate your help
Heh. How are you running ant if you don't know where the JRE is located?
I'm guessing that the JRE is already on the PATH so you might be
good-to-go already.
Thats the point .. see actually this is where it started... i h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Broken,
broken connection wrote:
> My installer is totally ant-based
Heh. How are you running ant if you don't know where the JRE is located?
I'm guessing that the JRE is already on the PATH so you might be
good-to-go already.
> and it does not have
> From: broken connection [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Tomcat and JRE redistribution
>
> If I am not wrong, it use to be in catalina.bat but Tomcat6
> does not ships that file anymore...
The .bat files are in the .zip download, not the .exe.
- Chuck
THIS CO
Thanks Steve,
My installer is totally ant-based and it does not have the capability to
search the registry and locate the entries...instead if you could tell me
which location in the Tomcat points to this JRE, I could over-write that
value instead...i think that would be much easier.
If I am not
> Thanks Chris,
> But if I make the users run the JRE installer and install it anywhere
> they want to.then how would the Tomcat silent install locate the
> JRE.
I don't know the details about the installer you are making but if you can
access the registry
then have the installer look in th
Thanks Chris,
But if I make the users run the JRE installer and install it anywhere they
want to.then how would the Tomcat silent install locate the JRE. The
whole purpose of why I was suggesting to include JRE inside Tomcat was to
resolve this path issue to JRE.
The end-users of the app woul
Broken,
broken connection wrote:
> I have read the license
> agreement for both Tomcat and JRE and I guess I can do that as long as I
> distribute the appropriate license files.
You might want to re-read the JRE license agreement. It used to be that
you needed to force your users to separately do
Hi Friends,
I am trying to make an installer for a small Tomcat web application and so
i am planning to include Tomcat in the cd itself. I have read the license
agreement for both Tomcat and JRE and I guess I can do that as long as I
distribute the appropriate license files.I have two doubts:
1.
14 matches
Mail list logo
