That makes sense to me. Thanks Chuck.
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>
>> From: hoffmandirt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: Tomcat Windows Service Installer vs Core zip install xml
>>
>> The Zip download option of Tomcat did not mind, but the
>>
> From: hoffmandirt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Tomcat Windows Service Installer vs Core zip install xml
>
> The Zip download option of Tomcat did not mind, but the
> Windows Service Installer option threw the "Unknown protocol
> c" error.
Possibly
col
c" error. Does anyone know why this would be? Both installs were pointing to
the same JDK.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Tomcat-Windows-Service-Installer-vs-Core-zip-install-xml-tp15048926p15069803.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at
-
> To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Tomcat-Windows-Service-Installer-vs-Core-zi
hoffmandirt wrote:
I am having issues with XSLT files depending on which download option of
Tomcat 6.0.14 that I choose. If I download the ZIP file under Core, my XSLT
files transform with no problems. However if I download and use the Windows
Service Installer instead, I am getting the followi
mcat-Windows-Service-Installer-vs-Core-zip-install-xml-tp15048926p15048926.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [
