-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pid,
On 10/29/12 2:45 PM, Pid wrote:
>
>> Thank you, This is very completed answer and I found it really
>> useful, and hopeful! Application is under heavy developing, app
>> has some page ( I call it page, I don't know java or serverlet)
>> with ver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Konstantin,
On 10/29/12 3:16 PM, verlag.preis...@t-online.de wrote:
> Hi Christopher,
>
> -Original-Nachricht-
>> Von: Christopher Schultz Datum:
>> Mon, 29 Oct 2012 03:52:36 +0100
>>
>> Personally, I prefer Linux based upon its friendlines
On 10/29/2012 03:16 PM, verlag.preis...@t-online.de wrote:
>> 3. Bizarre observations when using high-resolution (or even ms-res)
>> clocks and timers... seems like you can't get more than about 0.1-sec
>> resolution or so reliably -- or at least plausibly -- on a win32 box.
>
> Hmm, I think this
Hi Christopher,
-Original-Nachricht-
> Von: Christopher Schultz
> Datum: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 03:52:36 +0100
>
> Personally, I prefer Linux based upon its friendliness to developers
> and administrators: it's got the tools we need and it's easy to build
> additional tools if necessary.
Wel
> Thank you, This is very completed answer and I found it really useful, and
> hopeful!
> Application is under heavy developing, app has some page ( I call it page,
> I don't know java or serverlet) with very high latency occurs for now, some
> times we got out of memory error message.
> This is t
Ashkan Rahmani wrote:
...
Application is under heavy developing, app has some page ( I call it page,
I don't know java or serverlet) with very high latency occurs for now, some
times we got out of memory error message.
This is test server with windows 2003 x86 and tomcat 6.x. Chief developer
bel
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Pid,
>
> On 10/28/12 10:40 AM, Pid * wrote:
> > On 28 Oct 2012, at 11:39, Ashkan Rahmani
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi, Now I have a windows 2003 server and a
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 7:10 PM, André Warnier wrote:
> André Warnier wrote:
>
>> Ashkan Rahmani wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Now I have a windows 2003 server and a Tomcat 6.x on it.
>>> Our application has many many parts and it's very big.
>>>
>>> Actually we are not happy with tomcat performance, (We
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pid,
On 10/28/12 10:40 AM, Pid * wrote:
> On 28 Oct 2012, at 11:39, Ashkan Rahmani
> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Now I have a windows 2003 server and a Tomcat 6.x on it. Our
>> application has many many parts and it's very big.
>>
>> Actually we are not happy
André Warnier wrote:
Ashkan Rahmani wrote:
Hi,
Now I have a windows 2003 server and a Tomcat 6.x on it.
Our application has many many parts and it's very big.
Actually we are not happy with tomcat performance, (We are working very
hard on developing that software and improving
performance) .
W
On 28 Oct 2012, at 11:39, Ashkan Rahmani wrote:
> Hi,
> Now I have a windows 2003 server and a Tomcat 6.x on it.
> Our application has many many parts and it's very big.
>
> Actually we are not happy with tomcat performance, (We are working very
> hard on developing that software and improving
>
Ashkan Rahmani wrote:
Hi,
Now I have a windows 2003 server and a Tomcat 6.x on it.
Our application has many many parts and it's very big.
Actually we are not happy with tomcat performance, (We are working very
hard on developing that software and improving
performance) .
We want to improve app
Hi,
Now I have a windows 2003 server and a Tomcat 6.x on it.
Our application has many many parts and it's very big.
Actually we are not happy with tomcat performance, (We are working very
hard on developing that software and improving
performance) .
We want to improve application performance (wo
13 matches
Mail list logo
