Filip Hanik (mailing lists) [mailto:devli...@hanik.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 2:42 PM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: Tomcat 7.0.28 connection pool issue
>
> Martin, generally I would run with fairQueue="false" - this is the
> default.
>
ncy going on.
Filip
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Gainty [mailto:mgai...@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 1:38 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Tomcat 7.0.28 connection pool issue
>
>
> Hi Filip
>
> Is there an algorithm we can use to de
> -Original Message-
> From: cjder...@gmail.com [mailto:cjder...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of chris
> derham
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 10:47 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 7.0.28 connection pool issue
>
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Yasse
ed* and TC attribute of fairQueue should be set to false
Thanks!
Martin
__
Place legal disclaimer here
> From: devli...@hanik.com
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Tomcat 7.0.28 connection pool issue
> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 11:36:49 -06
your concurrency. Recommended
> is
> of course to increase maxActive if the database supports it.
>
> Filip
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Yasser [mailto:yarafa...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 11:33 AM
> > To: Tomcat Users Li
We use Oracle 11.2.0 and it can handle more than 1000 connections.
Here is the stacktrace of the connection pool empty error that I receive in
tomcat logs
Caused by: org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool.PoolExhaustedException:
[http-apr-30690-exec-743] Timeout: Pool empty. Unable to fetch a connection
in
nal Message-
> From: Yasser [mailto:yarafa...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 11:33 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 7.0.28 connection pool issue
>
> That was the issue with Tomcat 7.0.26 and they fixed it in 7.0.28
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012
You could try out
> http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/bz53367-jdbc-pool.jar
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Yasser [mailto:yarafa...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 9:39 AM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: Re: Tomcat 7.0.28 connection pool
; To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 7.0.28 connection pool issue
>
> Yes. It does show that maxactive has reached 100. I also use splunk to
> get
> the connection status at the oracle side.
> What I dont understand is that Resin needs just 50 connections to handle
> t
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Yasser wrote:
> Yes. It does show that maxactive has reached 100. I also use splunk to get
> the connection status at the oracle side.
> What I dont understand is that Resin needs just 50 connections to handle
> the same load. I am in the process of increasing th
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> > Subject: Tomcat 7.0.28 connection pool issue
> >
> ...
> > What is the issue?
> > When we run a stress test on the same codebase deployed to Tomcat 7.0.28,
> > at about 2hr45min into the test with 530 virtual users logged in (at
> -Original Message-
> From: Yasser [mailto:yarafa...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 9:44 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Tomcat 7.0.28 connection pool issue
>
...
> What is the issue?
> When we run a stress test on the same codebase d
What we are doing?
We are in the process of migrating from Resin 2.0.3 to Tomcat 7.0.28.
The codebase running on Resin when subjected to a stress test (using
resin's connection pool) with maxactive of 50 perform fine. It meets out
non functionality requirements including hits/sec, throughtput, pass
13 matches
Mail list logo
