-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kobi,
I can't really help if you don't give me more information
On 1/8/2011 11:36 AM, Kobi Biton wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 12:23 -0500, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> Okay, that will mean that the second server will handle, at most, 300
>> simult
Christopher,
On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 12:23 -0500, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Kobi,
>
> On 1/6/2011 12:14 PM, Kobi Biton wrote:
> > -Tomcat 6.0.22
>
> Great. Any opportunities to upgrade? Your version was never released and
> is over a year old.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kobi,
On 1/6/2011 12:14 PM, Kobi Biton wrote:
> -Tomcat 6.0.22
Great. Any opportunities to upgrade? Your version was never released and
is over a year old.
> - yes they are load balanced simple Round Robin Linux LVS , (LB
> distributes the requests
Hi Christopher thanks for the reply.
-Tomcat 6.0.22
- yes they are load balanced simple Round Robin Linux LVS , (LB
distributes the requests evenly)
- All the servers (But 1) had the following thread pool confguration
prior the change:
MaxThreads=1000 , minSpareThread=25,maxSpateThreads=75
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kobi,
On 1/6/2011 11:26 AM, Kobi Biton wrote:
> Recently I have exposed my tomcat 6
6.what?
> instances via JMX for monitoring I noticed that 1 of the servers is
> using twice the bust thread count then all others
Are they load-balanced in any way?
Hello Experts,
Recently I have exposed my tomcat 6 instances via JMX for monitoring I
noticed that 1 of the servers is using twice the bust thread count then
all others , then I noticed a configuration diff the server had 300 as
maxThreads while all other had 1000 as MaxThreads After changing it
