Hi Mark,
Apologies for the late reply on this, but I was the person that asked
you this performance question at ApacheCon. We reviewed this thread
and appreciate the analysis and discussion. The description below is
accurate; we have short lived non-keep-alived clients, so we're keenly
interested
2017-05-19 16:28 GMT+02:00 Christopher Schultz :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Rémy,
>
> On 5/19/17 8:47 AM, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> > 2017-05-19 14:42 GMT+02:00 Christopher Schultz
> > >> :
> >
> >> But here it's clear that the client wants to know "do I get a
> >> perf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Rémy,
On 5/19/17 8:47 AM, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> 2017-05-19 14:42 GMT+02:00 Christopher Schultz
> > :
>
>> But here it's clear that the client wants to know "do I get a
>> performance benefit swapping-out JSSE for OpenSSL. I think we all
>> knew
2017-05-19 14:42 GMT+02:00 Christopher Schultz :
> But here it's clear that the client wants to know "do I get a
> performance benefit swapping-out JSSE for OpenSSL. I think we all knew
> what the answer was. Jean-Frederick's slides from yesterday I believe
> include such benchmarks as well (NIO/O
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 5/18/17 9:47 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 18/05/2017 06:04, Christopher Schultz wrote: Mark,
>
> On 5/17/17 5:31 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
I got asked in the corridor at TomcatCon earlier today what
the relative performance of the TL
Am 18.05.2017 um 16:03 schrieb john.e.gr...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID:
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 8:47 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: TLS handshake performance
This time to the right list...
On 18/05/2017 06:04
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 8:47 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: TLS handshake performance
>
> This time to the right list...
>
> On 18/05/2017 06:04, Christopher Schult
This time to the right list...
On 18/05/2017 06:04, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 5/17/17 5:31 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
I got asked in the corridor at TomcatCon earlier today what the
relative performance of the TLS handshake was with 8.5.x,
2017-05-17 23:31 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas :
> Hi all,
>
> I got asked in the corridor at TomcatCon earlier today what the relative
> performance of the TLS handshake was with 8.5.x, the NIO connector and JSSE
> vs OpenSSL TLS implementation.
>
> This might be something that is of interest to a wider
2017-05-18 7:04 GMT+02:00 Christopher Schultz
:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Mark,
>
> On 5/17/17 5:31 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > I got asked in the corridor at TomcatCon earlier today what the
> > relative performance of the TLS handshake was with 8.5.x, the NIO
> > co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 5/17/17 5:31 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> I got asked in the corridor at TomcatCon earlier today what the
> relative performance of the TLS handshake was with 8.5.x, the NIO
> connector and JSSE vs OpenSSL TLS implementation.
I'm curious abou
Hi all,
I got asked in the corridor at TomcatCon earlier today what the relative
performance of the TLS handshake was with 8.5.x, the NIO connector and
JSSE vs OpenSSL TLS implementation.
This might be something that is of interest to a wider audience so here
goes...
The following results
12 matches
Mail list logo