RE: tomcat 5.5 -> tomcat 6.0

2009-12-16 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Xavier Vercoutere [mailto:xavier.vercout...@korfina.be] > Subject: RE: tomcat 5.5 -> tomcat 6.0 > > What is the preferred method for attachments ? None. But back to your real problem: none of the things you described are related to Tomcat, since there's no built-in

RE: tomcat 5.5 -> tomcat 6.0

2009-12-16 Thread Xavier Vercoutere
Hi What is the preferred method for attachments ? -Original Message- From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com] Sent: woensdag 16 december 2009 16:11 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: tomcat 5.5 -> tomcat 6.0 > From: Xavier Vercoutere [mailto:xavier.v

RE: tomcat 5.5 -> tomcat 6.0

2009-12-16 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Xavier Vercoutere [mailto:xavier.vercout...@korfina.be] > Subject: RE: tomcat 5.5 -> tomcat 6.0 > > I've attached the log files in a rar file. Attachments usually don't make it through (something stripped this one), and please never use .rar format for compr

RE: tomcat 5.5 -> tomcat 6.0

2009-12-16 Thread Xavier Vercoutere
> From: Xavier Vercoutere [mailto:xavier.vercout...@korfina.be] > Subject: tomcat 5.5 -> tomcat 6.0 > > Everything is functioning perfectly except for the built-in scheduling. What built-in scheduling is that? One of your webapps? It's a custom sync job ran by the quartz scheduler > I have to

RE: tomcat 5.5 -> tomcat 6.0

2009-12-16 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Xavier Vercoutere [mailto:xavier.vercout...@korfina.be] > Subject: tomcat 5.5 -> tomcat 6.0 > > Everything is functioning perfectly except for the built-in scheduling. What built-in scheduling is that? One of your webapps? > I have to restart the Tmocat 6.0 service almost every 2 days t