Re: mod_jk2 under heavy load

2005-10-20 Thread nag for
ould be a good value if your average > response > > # time is 1.7 seconds: > > worker.insight.retries=20 > > > > > > Property for tomcat > > > > address="${jboss.bind.address}" > > enableLookups="false" redirectPort="8443" >

Re: mod_jk2 under heavy load

2005-10-20 Thread j r
200" protocol="AJP/1.3"/> > > > -Original Message- > From: j r [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thu 20/10/2005 03:03 > To: Tomcat Users List > Cc: > Subject: Re: mod_jk2 under heavy load > > > > We handle 1-2million hits per hour using mod_jk-

RE: mod_jk2 under heavy load

2005-10-20 Thread fix
gt;enableLookups="false" redirectPort="8443" debug="0" >minProcessors="75" maxProcessors="200" protocol="AJP/1.3"/> > > > -Original Message- > From: j r [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >

RE: mod_jk2 under heavy load

2005-10-19 Thread Steve Gaunt
al Message- From: j r [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 20/10/2005 03:03 To: Tomcat Users List Cc: Subject: Re: mod_jk2 under heavy load We handle 1-2million hits per hour using mod_jk-1.2.13. No special config setup. It j

Re: mod_jk2 under heavy load

2005-10-19 Thread j r
We handle 1-2million hits per hour using mod_jk-1.2.13. No special config setup. It just worked out of the box. jr On 10/19/05, Steve Gaunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > HI, > > Has anyone else had any issue using mod_jk under heavy load.. > > It seems after a period of time(or large no. opf req