Re: apache2.2 tomcat5.5.27 Windows 2008 virtual hosts

2009-08-18 Thread java piet
/192.168.210.143:8081/ gives a network timeout. > >>> > >>> Tomcat without the Apache http server service gives the same network > >>> > >> timeout > >> > >>> when accessed through 8081. > >>> > >>> Hope thi

Re: apache2.2 tomcat5.5.27 Windows 2008 virtual hosts

2009-08-17 Thread java piet
gt; >>> On the other hand, when I use the ip address like > >>> http://192.168.210.143:8080/ > >>> I get the resource (/) not found error > >>> while http://192.168.210.143:8081/ gives a network timeout. > >>> > >>> Tomcat without

Re: apache2.2 tomcat5.5.27 Windows 2008 virtual hosts

2009-08-17 Thread David Smith
meout >> >>> when accessed through 8081. >>> >>> Hope this gives a clearer picture. >>> >>> Kind regards. >>> >>> Piet >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Caldarale, Charles R < >>&g

Re: apache2.2 tomcat5.5.27 Windows 2008 virtual hosts

2009-08-17 Thread java piet
; > > > Piet > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Caldarale, Charles R < > > chuck.caldar...@unisys.com> wrote: > > > > > >>> From: java piet [mailto:javap...@gmail.com] > >>> Subject: Re: apache2.2 tomcat5.5.27 Wind

Re: apache2.2 tomcat5.5.27 Windows 2008 virtual hosts

2009-08-17 Thread David Smith
; > chuck.caldar...@unisys.com> wrote: > > >>> From: java piet [mailto:javap...@gmail.com] >>> Subject: Re: apache2.2 tomcat5.5.27 Windows 2008 virtual hosts >>> >>> The reason for the Apache http server is because I thought I >>> need it to h

Re: apache2.2 tomcat5.5.27 Windows 2008 virtual hosts

2009-08-16 Thread java piet
ect: Re: apache2.2 tomcat5.5.27 Windows 2008 virtual hosts > > > > The reason for the Apache http server is because I thought I > > need it to handle the virtual hosting. > > No, Tomcat can handle that quite well: > http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/virtual-hosting-h

RE: apache2.2 tomcat5.5.27 Windows 2008 virtual hosts

2009-08-16 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: java piet [mailto:javap...@gmail.com] > Subject: Re: apache2.2 tomcat5.5.27 Windows 2008 virtual hosts > > The reason for the Apache http server is because I thought I > need it to handle the virtual hosting. No, Tomcat can handle that quite well: http://tomcat.apache.org

Re: apache2.2 tomcat5.5.27 Windows 2008 virtual hosts

2009-08-16 Thread java piet
Hi André, Thank you so much for the quick response. I will check your feedback as soon as I have access to the server again. The reason for the Apache http server is because I thought I need it to handle the virtual hosting. As for the port 80, something else is already using it on the server.

Re: apache2.2 tomcat5.5.27 Windows 2008 virtual hosts

2009-08-16 Thread André Warnier
Piet, Thanks for providing all the information needed to help you. Not everyone does, and it's a p. in the a. But your configuration is a bit strange. Actually, it cannot work the way it is described, because you have both Apache httpd AND Apache Tomcat (2 different processes) trying to "liste