RE: URL mangling

2007-08-23 Thread Hehl, Thomas
The benefit is the client is already doing it this way and wants us to it the same. The realities of the IT world. Alas... -Original Message- From: Ben Souther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 8:23 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: URL mangling Probably, I

RE: URL mangling

2007-08-23 Thread Ben Souther
nt: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 9:10 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: URL mangling > > Yes, it should. > Are you running tomcat behind Apache HTTPD or another web server to > serve up static content? > > > > > > > On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 09:17

RE: URL mangling

2007-08-23 Thread Hehl, Thomas
well? -Original Message- From: Ben Souther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 9:10 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: URL mangling Yes, it should. Are you running tomcat behind Apache HTTPD or another web server to serve up static content? On Wed, 2007-08-

RE: URL mangling

2007-08-22 Thread Ben Souther
nd I only get the original one, nothing for the > images and stuff. > > > -Original Message- > From: Ben Souther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 9:03 AM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: URL mangling > > > So now I

RE: URL mangling

2007-08-22 Thread Hehl, Thomas
AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: URL mangling > So now I'm trying to see if there's a way to mangle these urls dynamically > on the security server instead so that I can use the same JSP for > everything. I tried using a filter, but that works ONLY for the actual > request itse

Re: URL mangling

2007-08-22 Thread Ben Souther
> So now I'm trying to see if there's a way to mangle these urls dynamically > on the security server instead so that I can use the same JSP for > everything. I tried using a filter, but that works ONLY for the actual > request itself. Filters evidently don't see requests for images or > stylesheet