-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David,
On 5/11/2009 10:22 AM, David kerber wrote:
> From the quick
> reading I did, I imagine that will give me a bit of a performance hit
> compared to using ThreadLocal, but since I've never used the ThreadLocal
> pattern before, I didn't want to tr
Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
...
As the JavaDoc says
http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/text/SimpleDateFormat.html
"Date formats are not synchronized. It is recommended to create
separate format instances for each thread"
You may either create a new instance of SimpleDateFormat each time,
2009/5/11 David kerber :
> This is related to the performance issues discussed in the thread
> "Performance with many small requests".
>
> When I reworked my servlet to synchronize only on pieces that needed to be
> synchronized, rather than on the entire request processing routine, I am now
> thro
> From: David kerber [mailto:dcker...@verizon.net]
> Subject: Trouble parsing datetime strings
>
> Declared at the class level, I have:
>
> private static final SimpleDateFormatsdfFullDateTime = new
> SimpleDateFormat( "-MM-dd HH:mm:ss" );
Oops. Read the fine print for SimpleDateFor
Hello,
"Date formats are not synchronized. It is recommended to create separate
format instances for each thread. If multiple threads access a format
concurrently, it must be synchronized externally."
This is from the reference of JDK API.
2009/5/11 David kerber
> This is related to the perfor
