RE: Tomcat Windows Service Installer vs Core zip install xml

2008-01-24 Thread hoffmandirt
That makes sense to me. Thanks Chuck. Caldarale, Charles R wrote: > >> From: hoffmandirt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: Tomcat Windows Service Installer vs Core zip install xml >> >> The Zip download option of Tomcat did not mind, but the >>

RE: Tomcat Windows Service Installer vs Core zip install xml

2008-01-24 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: hoffmandirt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Tomcat Windows Service Installer vs Core zip install xml > > The Zip download option of Tomcat did not mind, but the > Windows Service Installer option threw the "Unknown protocol > c" error. Possibly

Re: Tomcat Windows Service Installer vs Core zip install xml

2008-01-24 Thread hoffmandirt
This issue was resolved by correctly utilizing the constructor of the StreamSource object. It was expecting a String in URL/URI format and we were passing in the file name only. The Zip download option of Tomcat did not mind, but the Windows Service Installer option threw the "Unknown protocol c"

Re: Tomcat Windows Service Installer vs Core zip install xml

2008-01-23 Thread hoffmandirt
Interesting, however I am pointing to the same JDK 1.5 for both. I wanted to switch to the service instead of the bat startup and shutdown scripts. I will give that a try and check it out. I was searching google for "could not compile stylesheet". markt-2 wrote: > > hoffmandirt wrote: >> I am

Re: Tomcat Windows Service Installer vs Core zip install xml

2008-01-23 Thread Mark Thomas
hoffmandirt wrote: I am having issues with XSLT files depending on which download option of Tomcat 6.0.14 that I choose. If I download the ZIP file under Core, my XSLT files transform with no problems. However if I download and use the Windows Service Installer instead, I am getting the followi