Hmm, interesting... Thanks for explanation Mark!
2015-06-03 12:22 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
> On 03/06/2015 07:24, Tweak Ronaldo wrote:
> > Thanks Mark, yes I have mixed together Tomcat JDBC 8 and DBCP 7, my bad.
> > Although I don't understand why Tomcat JDBC don't use DBCP as default
> > solution
Mark, big thanks for a quick historical review, it was very intreresting!
I was thinking that tomcat-jdbc is something new, but wasn't sure about
project maintenance.
2015-06-03 12:22 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
> On 03/06/2015 07:24, Tweak Ronaldo wrote:
> > Thanks Mark, yes I have mixed together To
On 03/06/2015 07:24, Tweak Ronaldo wrote:
> Thanks Mark, yes I have mixed together Tomcat JDBC 8 and DBCP 7, my bad.
> Although I don't understand why Tomcat JDBC don't use DBCP as default
> solution for connections pooling.
Tomcat does - and always has - used Commons DBCP for connection pooling
b
Thanks Mark, yes I have mixed together Tomcat JDBC 8 and DBCP 7, my bad.
Although I don't understand why Tomcat JDBC don't use DBCP as default
solution for connections pooling.
2015-06-02 16:59 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
> On 01/06/2015 14:22, Tweak Ronaldo wrote:
> > Hello guys,
>
> Assuming you do
2015-06-01 16:22 GMT+03:00 Tweak Ronaldo :
> Hello guys, we have migrated to Tomcat DBCP 8.0.18 from 7.0.37 recently and
> faced the following issue:
> after database restart (Postgres), our application wasn't been able to
> restore connectivity to DB, all connections were closed and every time,
>
On 01/06/2015 14:22, Tweak Ronaldo wrote:
> Hello guys,
Assuming you don't want to limit your question to men only, you would be
better to use of of the following greetings:
Hello,
Hello all,
Hello folks,
etc.
> we have migrated to Tomcat DBCP 8.0.18 from 7.0.37 recently and
> faced the followin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Rahul,
On 3/6/13 12:49 PM, Rahul Somasunderam wrote:
> I'm running Tomcat 7.0.23. I've got a question about configuring
> the logging of DBCP Failures.
Echoing Daniel's suggestion: upgrade.
> I've go this in my context xml file.
>
>
The "path"
Thanks Dan,
The initialSize brought the logs into my catalina.out.
R,
rahul
On Mar 6, 2013, at 2:21 PM, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
> On Mar 6, 2013, at 5:07 PM, Rahul Somasunderam wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mar 6, 2013, at 11:26 AM, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 6, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Rahul Somasunder
On Mar 6, 2013, at 5:07 PM, Rahul Somasunderam wrote:
>
> On Mar 6, 2013, at 11:26 AM, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
>
>> On Mar 6, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Rahul Somasunderam wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm running Tomcat 7.0.23.
>>
>> This is getting pretty old, you might want to consider upgrading.
>
> I
On Mar 6, 2013, at 11:26 AM, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
> On Mar 6, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Rahul Somasunderam wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm running Tomcat 7.0.23.
>
> This is getting pretty old, you might want to consider upgrading.
I will, but I don't think this has to do much with tomcat being old. I thi
On Mar 6, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Rahul Somasunderam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running Tomcat 7.0.23.
This is getting pretty old, you might want to consider upgrading.
> I've got a question about configuring the logging of DBCP Failures.
>
> I've go this in my context xml file.
>
>
> name="jd
>>
>> I agree with you. Because of that, I've got that question :-)
>
> Hopefully I've answered it..?
>
> - -chris
A lof of thanks, Chris.
I'm going to test it and I'll make feedback to the list
Regards
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jose,
On 10/11/12 3:31 PM, Jose María Zaragoza wrote:
>> How can you tell the difference between a primary server being
>> "down" and the primary server needing to (otherwise?) fail-over
>> to the backup? I'm confused about your nomenclature (primary
> How can you tell the difference between a primary server being "down"
> and the primary server needing to (otherwise?) fail-over to the
> backup? I'm confused about your nomenclature (primary failover means
> mirror -> primary?).
Well, I'm newbie in SQLServer but I think that primary and mirror
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jose María,
On 10/10/12 3:00 PM, Jose María Zaragoza wrote:
> I want to add database failover to my web application I use Tomcat
> 6 and SQLServer database + JDBC Driver 3.0
>
> But my doubts are about what happen with pooled connections. The
> scen
On 6/27/2012 8:35 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
100 active db connections sounds like a lot. Do you really need to
support 100 simultaneous connections to your database? Can your
database support that many connections with active queries from each?
Do you have a cluster? Remember that each membe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kiran,
On 6/26/12 7:24 PM, Kiran Badi wrote:
> type="javax.sql.DataSource" maxActive="100" maxIdle="30"
> maxWait="1"
100 active db connections sounds like a lot. Do you really need to
support 100 simultaneous connections to your database? Can y
Probably waited too long for a connection. What does your pool
configuration look like? Look in META-INF/context.xml or, I suppose, in
conf/server.xml for elements.
type="javax.sql.DataSource"
maxActive="100" maxIdle="30" maxWait="1"
username="user" password
On 6/26/2012 12:09 PM, Steven Sinclair wrote:
> You can use java jmx console to monitor the number of db connections.
Thanks Steven, I will check this.Actually servlet was leaking connection
and I had forgot to close connection.Fixed it now.
But I still need to monitor DB side.I will check jmx con
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kiran,
On 6/26/12 1:11 AM, Kiran Badi wrote:
> While testing the pagination links ,I am getting below error,
>
> SEVERE: null org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.SQLNestedException: Cannot
> get a connection, pool error Timeout waiting for idle object
Proba
在 2012-6-26，13:11，Kiran Badi 写道：
> Hi All,
>
> While testing the pagination links ,I am getting below error,
>
> SEVERE: null
> org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.SQLNestedException: Cannot get a connection, pool
> error Timeout waiting for idle object
>at
> org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.PoolingDa
10:25 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: tomcat dbcp encryption
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ognjen,
>
> On 3/27/12 6:32 AM, Ognjen Blagojevic wrote:
> > 이재만,
> >
> > On 27.3.2012 9:54, 이재만 wrote:
> >> ho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ognjen,
On 3/27/12 6:32 AM, Ognjen Blagojevic wrote:
> 이재만,
>
> On 27.3.2012 9:54, 이재만 wrote:
>> how do i encrypt my datasource's user and password in server.xml
>> ??
>
> Read this: http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/FAQ/Password
No, he didn't like th
이재만,
On 27.3.2012 9:54, 이재만 wrote:
how do i encrypt my datasource's user and password in server.xml ??
Read this: http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/FAQ/Password
-Ognjen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache
On 27/03/2012 08:53, 이재만 wrote:
> hello everybody...
>
> somebody help me..please..
>
> how do i encrypt my datasource's user and password in server.xml ??
http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/FAQ/Password
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: u
Stevo,
OK, in the context of tomcat-jdbc, your questions do make more sense.
Glad you were able to find the answers.
BTW, I would strongly recommend tomcat-jdbc over DBCP. Been working
with it for a while and it's very nice.
Dan
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 06:44 -0800, Stevo Slavić wrote:
> Hello D
Hello Daniel,
You're right, commons-dbcp and tomcat-dbcp seem to be same, I missed
tomcat-jdbc module which seems to provide extensions and judging by
the pom (see [1]) it depends only on tomcat-juli. I found the answers
at [2] and [3].
Thanks!
Regards,
Stevo.
[1]
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2
> 1) Can tomcat-dbcp be used outside of tomcat e.g. in non-web apps?
Yes, but tomcat-dbcp is exactly the same as commons-dbcp. You would
probably just want to use commons-dbcp.
> 2) If yes, are all features available as when used within tomcat?
It has the same feature set as commons-dbcp.
> From: Bill Davidson [mailto:bill...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: Tomcat DBCP
>
> If we don't want to buy SpringSource tc, do we need to check
> it out from SVN and build it?
Not sure what the official status of the package is right now, but you can get
it here:
http://s
On 01/07/2010 23:31, Bill Davidson wrote:
On 6/9/2010 2:15 AM, Altanis Alexandros wrote:
>I have been reading about the new Tomcat DBCP in a couple of blogs
>lately, as I am interested in Connection Pooling for an application I am
>working on. Here they are:
>
>http://vigilbose.blogspot.com/
On 6/9/2010 2:15 AM, Altanis Alexandros wrote:
>I have been reading about the new Tomcat DBCP in a couple of blogs
>lately, as I am interested in Connection Pooling for an application I am
>working on. Here they are:
>
>http://vigilbose.blogspot.com/2009/03/apache-commons-dbcp-and-tomcat-jdbc.html
Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 1:31 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Tomcat DBCP
>
> On 09/06/2010 10:15, Altanis Alexandros wrote:
>> My question is this: can I use this feature with Tomcat 6?
>
> Yes.
>
>>
Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 1:31 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat DBCP
On 09/06/2010 10:15, Altanis Alexandros wrote:
> My question is this: can I use this feature with Tomcat 6?
Yes.
> Where can I get a
On 09/06/2010 10:15, Altanis Alexandros wrote:
> My question is this: can I use this feature with Tomcat 6?
Yes.
> Where can I get a hold of the source code? I found some svn
> links that point to 404.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/
Mark
2010/3/10 José Paumard :
> To be sure that DBCP is not providing closed connections to Hibernate, I
> added the following to the Resource element, but with no success : (...)
Note, that META-INF/context.xml of a web application is copied to
${catalina.base}/conf/Catalina/localhost/.xml
when your a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yagnesh,
On 11/18/2009 1:32 AM, Yagnesh Chawda wrote:
> There is no difference in the outcome when I use "com.mysql.jdbc.Driver"
>
>max_connections=200 is still same in MySQL.
That is very strange.
Can you try to configure the data source thr
Hi,
There is no difference in the outcome when I use "com.mysql.jdbc.Driver"
max_connections=200 is still same in MySQL. I confirmed that MySQL is
able to handle that much load by running JMeter load testing which causes my
application to create even 95 connection if I set "maxActive" connec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yagnesh,
On 11/17/2009 10:51 AM, Yagnesh Chawda wrote:
> Thanks for reply. I had tried using "com.mysql.jdbc.Driver" as well
> earlier. But no luck :(
What does happen when you use com.mysql.jdbc.Driver?
What are the current values for max_connect
Hi Chris,
Thanks for reply. I had tried using "com.mysql.jdbc.Driver" as well
earlier. But no luck :(
Christopher Schultz-2 wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Yagnesh,
>
> On 11/17/2009 12:32 AM, Yagnesh Chawda wrote:
>> Thanks Chris, That was just a typo. Than
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yagnesh,
On 11/17/2009 12:32 AM, Yagnesh Chawda wrote:
> Thanks Chris, That was just a typo. Thanks for pointing it out. But in real
> configuration was was not commented. It was some other config which I was
> trying and forgot to uncomment it in po
Hey,
Thanks Chris, That was just a typo. Thanks for pointing it out. But in real
configuration was was not commented. It was some other config which I was
trying and forgot to uncomment it in posting.
Christopher Schultz-2 wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Yagnes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yagnesh,
On 11/16/2009 9:09 AM, Yagnesh Chawda wrote:
> My bean definition is as follows for DBCP:
>
> class="org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSource">
>
>
Your bean appears to be almost entirely commented-out. Is this your r
Peter Crowther wrote:
> 2009/11/16 Pid :
>> You managed to subscribe to the list, can't you follow the instructions on
>> how to unsubscribe? Clues at the bottom of every email.
>
> We keep saying that, and it keeps being a problem for users.
>
> The email-based unsubscribe appears to be unrelia
2009/11/16 Pid :
> You managed to subscribe to the list, can't you follow the instructions on
> how to unsubscribe? Clues at the bottom of every email.
We keep saying that, and it keeps being a problem for users.
The email-based unsubscribe appears to be unreliable, I suspect due to
an overzealo
On 16/11/2009 14:12, Evan Siegel wrote:
UNSUBSCRIBE ME!
I have been emailing you guys for over a week to unsubcribe me.
> PLEASE CEASE AND DESIST FROM SENDING ME MORE MAILINGS FROM THIS LIST!
"You guys"? There's only one email from you, that I can see to this
list, which is this one. So... ?
UNSUBSCRIBE ME!
I have been emailing you guys for over a week to unsubcribe me. PLEASE CEASE
AND DESIST FROM SENDING ME MORE MAILINGS FROM THIS LIST!
Please visit our websites at
http://www.geocities.com/evan_j_siegel'>http://www.geocities.com/evan_j_siegel";>http://www.geocities.com/evan_j_sie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ashoknan,
On 5/6/2009 5:43 PM, ashoknan wrote:
> This app was running fine in Weblogic but after migrating to Tomcat
> 6+ DBCP we are seeing the below exception.
Which version of TC 6 are you using? Are you using the stock DBCP or
Filip's new-fangled
the maven jars/upload is still in process, if you want to contribute
help, take a look at res/maven in the tomcat 6 tree
Filip
lightbulb432 wrote:
The tomcat-dbcp library doesn't seem to be available from the Maven
repository for Tomcat at http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/m2-repository or
rep
I could make this work with 'validationQuery' parameter.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 7:08 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat / DBCP / Oracle / Reconnect
Krishna Paparaju wrote:
> I am t
Krishna Paparaju wrote:
> I am trying to find is there anyway Tomcat can be configured to
> reconnect back to DB once it is up. I know autoReconnect flag works for
> mySQL. Is there any equivalent in Oracle/thin driver?
You could use testOnBorrow="true" and a validationQuery to achieve
this. Check
When starting a new thread (ie sending a message to the list about a
new topic) please do not reply to an existing message and change the
subject line. To many of the list archiving services and mail clients
used by list subscribers this makes your new message appear as part
of the old thread. Thi
51 matches
Mail list logo
