The sequence of version numbers is:
1.2.1, 1.2.2, ..., 1.2.9, 1.2.10, 1.2.11,...
Therefore, 1.2.15 is newer than 1.2.9
Each release is given the next number in the sequence. This might not
look correct to a mathematician but then again neither does a number
like 1.2.6 !
Mark
Propes, Barry L wro
That makes sense now. Thankyou.
Garthfield
Rick G wrote:
Doing a directory list, puts them in alphabetical order, which isn't the
real order, just look at the dates.. Think of .5-.9 as .05 - .09. jk-1.2.15
is the latest.
Jk-1.2.05
Jk-1.2.06
Jk-1.2.07
Jk-1.2.08
Jk-1.2.09
Jk-1.2.10
Jk-1.2.1
Doing a directory list, puts them in alphabetical order, which isn't the
real order, just look at the dates.. Think of .5-.9 as .05 - .09. jk-1.2.15
is the latest.
Jk-1.2.05
Jk-1.2.06
Jk-1.2.07
Jk-1.2.08
Jk-1.2.09
Jk-1.2.10
Jk-1.2.11
etc
-Original Message-
From: Garthfield Carter [mail
wouldn't that mean that those bigger numbers are newer versions, but not as
stable and thoroughly tested?
I think the latest stable means one where all the bugs are resolved. Maybe
those newer ones don't have everything fixed yet?
-Original Message-
From: Garthfield Carter [mailto:[EMAIL
