Hi,
2016-05-23 18:56 GMT+09:00 Hans-Joachim Kliemeck <
hans-joachim.kliem...@hays.de>:
> Hey,
>
> > If you do not set the LocalMember,
> > the implementation class of local members will become MemberImpl rather
> than the StaticMember.
> > In addition, you can not explicitly specify the domain an
2016-05-19 17:55 GMT+09:00 Hans-Joachim Kliemeck <
hans-joachim.kliem...@hays.de>:
> Hey,
>
> currently i'm building up a tomcat cluster and after studying the
> documentation/source some questions came up:
>
> Is it really necessary to add a LocalMember xml element to the
> StaticMembershipInterc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Theo,
On 12/17/14 11:22 AM, Théo Chamley wrote:
> Mark, things haven't changed on Tomcat8 for the logging properties,
> your configuration did work.
>
> In the end, I had two problems: * My client did not have a
> element in his web.xml
This was
On 2014-12-09 19:01, Mark Eggers wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/9/2014 9:48 AM, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Théo Chamley
wrote:
On 2014-12-08 21:22, Ameer Mawia wrote:
Hi Theo,
Since you are using static membership and NOT
dynamic(multi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/9/2014 9:48 AM, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Théo Chamley
> wrote:
>
>> On 2014-12-08 21:22, Ameer Mawia wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Theo,
>>>
>>> Since you are using static membership and NOT
>>> dynamic(multi-cast) which auto
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Théo Chamley wrote:
> On 2014-12-08 21:22, Ameer Mawia wrote:
>
>> Hi Theo,
>>
>> Since you are using static membership and NOT dynamic(multi-cast) which
>> auto-detect members, my current understanding says that you will have to
>> add entry of all the members of
On 2014-12-08 21:22, Ameer Mawia wrote:
Hi Theo,
Since you are using static membership and NOT dynamic(multi-cast) which
auto-detect members, my current understanding says that you will have
to
add entry of all the members of your cluster in each of nodes
server.xml.
Example:
My cluster has
Hi Theo,
Since you are using static membership and NOT dynamic(multi-cast) which
auto-detect members, my current understanding says that you will have to
add entry of all the members of your cluster in each of nodes server.xml.
Example:
My cluster has two nodes. So to configure these I had add th
On 29/07/2013 12:27, Willem Fibbe - Realworks BV wrote:
> I'm hoping someone can provide some suggestions to identify the exact problem
> (and the solution:)).
This is one of those things (like SSL) where several things all need to
be lined up or nothing works and debugging it is tricky.
The bes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pid,
On 6/13/12 8:12 AM, Pid * wrote:
> On 12 Jun 2012, at 18:22, Albert Kam
> wrote:
>
>> I've noticed that in the documentation, it says a lot about
>> session replication.
>>
>> I wonder what can be omitted in the configurations for a
>> statele
On 06/12/2012 07:21 PM, Albert Kam wrote:
I've noticed that in the documentation, it says a lot about session replication.
I wonder what can be omitted in the configurations for a stateless
java webapp setup (without any sessions),
to hopefully get a simpler configuration or even gain more effic
On 12 Jun 2012, at 18:22, Albert Kam wrote:
> I've noticed that in the documentation, it says a lot about session
> replication.
>
> I wonder what can be omitted in the configurations for a stateless
> java webapp setup (without any sessions),
> to hopefully get a simpler configuration or even g
Thanks All for the information provided.
RB
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Konstantin Kolinko
wrote:
> 2011/2/6 Caldarale, Charles R :
> >
> >> We have a simpleTCP cluster built between 2 Tomcat 6.0.18 nodes
> >
> > It would be beneficial for you to move up to a newer level - that one is
> over
2011/2/6 Caldarale, Charles R :
>
>> We have a simpleTCP cluster built between 2 Tomcat 6.0.18 nodes
>
> It would be beneficial for you to move up to a newer level - that one is over
> 2.5 years old, and lots and lots of fixes have gone in since then.
>
>> when we use another IP like 172.x.x.x the
> From: rajeshwar bharathi [mailto:rajeshwarbhara...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Tomcat Cluster Membership establishment query
> To: d...@tomcat.apache.org; Tomcat Users List
Don't cross-post.
> We have a simpleTCP cluster built between 2 Tomcat 6.0.18 nodes
It would be beneficial for you to move up
rg
Cc:
Data: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:06:07 +0200
Oggetto: Re: Tomcat cluster error (null pointer except) on NioReceiver.java:266
> In the post before I sed why accept() returns null, so i was> investigating
> in tomcat and jdk_1.6 source code, > and I found that the method accept in
&
In the post before I sed why accept() returns null, so i was
investigating in tomcat and jdk_1.6 source code,
and I found that the method accept in ServerSocketChannel.java can
return null in case of non-blocking socket e no connection available.
Should this be tested?
and why ask for session rep
Hi, thanks for reply,
I was watching too the NioReceiver.java source code, and I was wondering
why server.accept() does not throw an exception instead null, mha!.
The java version in production is 1.6.0_20 vendor Sun 64bit.
while in my devel environment is 1.6.0_11 vendor Sun 32bit.
In catalina.o
2010/10/22 Stefano Suzzi :
>
> Hi, i've 3 tomcat 6.0.26 on 3 different IBM machines linux RedHat el
> 5, kernel.osrelease = 2.6.18-194.el5 .
>
> The 3 tomcat are giving an error that cannot replicate the session,
> of course I cannot replicate the error in my devel systems that work
> perfectly w
for advice
-Message d'origine-
De : André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Envoyé : vendredi 19 février 2010 11:21
À : Tomcat Users List
Objet : Re: tomcat cluster does'nt work
Stephane Lorin wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I'm configuring a tomcat cluster with 3 nodes.
Stephane Lorin wrote:
Hi,
I'm configuring a tomcat cluster with 3 nodes. I use Tomcat 5.0.19 with jdk
1.4_2.19
Both these things are about 10 years old, and not developed nor
supported anymore by their respective suppliers.
That looks like a very bad way to start, and you will get very lit
On 31/01/2010 17:50, Alexander Diedler wrote:
> Hello,
> We spend a lot of time to investigate the mistake, but I would not be found
> by us. We have two Virtual Machines with Windows 2003 R2 Standard Edition and
> on every node there is a Apache 2.2.14 and Tomcat 6.0.20 (and tcnative
> installe
ok, we'll try this out then.
One question about the regression, would it occur if the 2 nodes are in
different Solaris containers (both having different IPs) but on the same
physical host?
Thanks a lot!
Wong
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <
devli...@hanik.com> wrote:
hi Wong, yes, that one does implement a higher level of thread safety,
and most likely would resolve your problem.
With 6.0.20, there is a regression where tomcat nodes on the same host
wont discover each other
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308
Filip
On 08/25/2009 07:22
A brief look through "svn log
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/ha/session/DeltaRequest.java";
turns up this:
r618823 | fhanik | 2008-02-06 07:29:56 +0800 (Wed, 06 Feb 2008) | 3 lines
Remov
Thanks, Filip.
I'm running 6.0.14 right now. Would you have any idea whether any changes in
the code since then would have fixed something like this? I can try to push
for an upgrade to 6.0.20 but the app owners would probably want to know
whether it would be fixed for sure since they have to go th
I've taken a look at the code.
The fix for this is easy, but it doesn't explain why it happens. This is
a concurrency issue, but if you're not running the latest tomcat
version, then it could already have been fixed.
best
Filip
On 08/25/2009 01:55 AM, CS Wong wrote:
Hi Michael,
The logs are
what version of Tomcat, and we will get it fixed
On 08/25/2009 12:22 AM, CS Wong wrote:
Periodically, I'm getting problems with my Tomcat 6 cluster (2 nodes). One
of the nodes would just go haywire and generate a ton of logs repeating the
following:
Aug 25, 2009 11:44:10 AM org.apache.catalina.
Hi Michael,
The logs are the bit that went haywire. The applications at this point still
work but often, there's not enough time to troubleshoot much else. The logs
can increase by 5-6GB in a matter of an hour or so and hence, we often just
kill the service (normal shutdown.sh doesn't respond any m
CS Wong schrieb:
Periodically, I'm getting problems with my Tomcat 6 cluster (2 nodes).
One of the nodes would just go haywire
Could you elaborate on what "going haywire" means?
Below, you write:
[The NoSuchElementException is] the only thing that it shows. The
other node in the cluster is s
Hi,
yes it is 6.0.20. I just downgrade to 6.0.18 and it seems to work. Thanks!
2009/6/15 Filip Hanik - Dev Lists :
> you could be running into this regression
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308
> if you are using 6.0.20, otherwise you may not have multicasting configured
>
you could be running into this regression
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308
if you are using 6.0.20, otherwise you may not have multicasting configured
Filip
Sergey Elin wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to setup a simple 2-node tomcat cluster on Windows 7 RC.
Everything works fine
In general you do not need to set the redirect parameter.
On 26.05.2009 16:41, Alberto Jesus La Rosa Agramonte wrote:
> Hi, If a don't set the redirect parameter on the workers.properties file,
> how work the load balancer???
-
T
> From: Alexander Diedler [mailto:adied...@tecracer.de]
> Subject: AW: Tomcat Cluster Deployment without WAR
>
> No info about Deployment of Apps without war-Files?
Just what's in the doc. But if you don't bother to tell us something useful,
such as the Tomcat version, then it's rather difficul
> From: Alexander Diedler [mailto:adied...@tecracer.de]
> WatchDir is F:\inetpub\wwwroot if there is something changed,
> it should be deployed to all other cluster nodes.
If you're on Windows, why not use the built-in file replication to replicate
changes between the nodes rather than use Tom
my guess is that when you store a hibernate object in your session, it
doesn't transfer well,
Filip
dhanesh kk wrote:
List,
I am trying a transparent failover cluster with 2 separate TC-6.0.8
nodes with a apache2.2 node as LoadBalancer with mod_proxy_ajp
JDK 1.5.0_15 and platform De
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gustavo,
Gustavo Araujo wrote:
> Is it possible to use the same port protocol="HTTP/1.1"
>
> In two different cluster nodes?
Are the nodes binding to separate IP addresses?
> When i put both ones in 8080 they don't balance the requests.
What beh
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>
>
> Look at the workDir attribute of the and elements.
>
> By the way, you might want to consider moving up to a more recent 5.5
> version (5.5.27 is current). Lots of fixes have gone in since 5.5.12 was
> released over three years ago.
>
> - Chuck
>
>
It
> From: forum123 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Tomcat Cluster and NFS mounted webapp
>
> How do I set so that just the "work" directory is different
> per instance?
Look at the workDir attribute of the and elements.
By the way, you might want to consider m
Even though I have little experience with tomcat clusteringFor this
situation I would specify one work directory in the config files (located on
nfs) that points to a local directory
that way everything can be shared except the work directory
Hope this helps
Regards,
Serge Fonville
On Mon, Oct
markt-2 wrote:
>
>
> Sharing the bin, common, server, shared and webapps directories is fine.
> Sharing conf could be OK if you are careful
> Sharing logs, temp and work is likely to cause problems.
>
> Did you look into using CATALINA_HOME/CATALINA_BASE?
>
>
Yes, we use CATALINA_HOME/CATAL
forum123 wrote:
> We're setting up a simple Tomcat cluster using Tomcat 5.5.12. There will be
> initially 2 Tomcat instances on 2 physical Linux servers in this cluster.
> Is mounting a shared NFS folder appropriate for this?
Sharing the bin, common, server, shared and webapps directories is fin
2008 4:02 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat Cluster Deployer
Paul McGurn wrote:
Thanks Mark.
I'll work at actually translating this into real documentation and
examples. As far as patching, I'm not qualified to do that, but
I'd be willing to take a crack at it
]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 4:02 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Tomcat Cluster Deployer
>
> Paul McGurn wrote:
>> Thanks Mark.
>>
>> I'll work at actually translating this into real documentation and examples.
>> As far as patching
cGurn
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 4:02 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat Cluster Deployer
Paul McGurn wrote:
> Thanks Mark.
>
> I'll work at actually translating this into real documentation and exam
e all the source for the
docs is in xml not html.
Mark
>
> Paul McGurn
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 3:50 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Tomcat Cluster Deployer
>
> Paul McGurn w
--
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 3:50 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat Cluster Deployer
Paul McGurn wrote:
> Is there any (complete) documentation on the Cluster Deployer? The official
> documentation doesn't actually say anything
Paul McGurn wrote:
> Is there any (complete) documentation on the Cluster Deployer? The official
> documentation doesn't actually say anything about it (or let alone anything
> useful at all...):
> http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/config/cluster-deployer.html
The source code is probably
In Tomcat 6, use DeltaManager or BackupManager
Filip
Lia wrote:
Hi everybody, <<...>> <<...>>
I am using
- Tomcat 6.0.18 ( but I’ve also tested the same scenario with Tomcat
6.0.16 and Tomcat 6.0.14 and I got the same problem);
- in cluster ( two machines);
- on Debian x64, 4.0.
When us
you should add the TcpFailureDetector interceptor into the stack, as
well as the async interceptor
these should be defined before your static membership interceptor.
you might also want to add in TCP ping interceptor, before both of the above one
className="org.apach
Thanks.
Some more questions:
-- In a scenario with two nodes, if I shutdown one, the other is instantly
ready to receive and respond to requests, or it is necessary to wait a
while?
In a procuction scenario we cannot wait, because requests are frequently.
-- The 35 seconds refers to the initial ti
HI Andrew,
Your mcastDropTime="1000" is to low. Please set it to 3 and it
is true that you must wait
> 35 sec before you can restart a cluster node. Use the Java Service
Wrapper or add this to your start scripts to configure this.
Peter
Am 22.02.2008 um 11:48 schrieb Andrew Hole:
gp456 wrote:
thanks for your reply.
first the fix you mentioned is not in the current tomcat release (6.0.16).
Since I have to build/patch the tomcat for a productive environment what
whould you recommend: patch the 6.0.16 sources or build tomcat from the
newest trunk?
either or, they haven'
thanks for your reply.
first the fix you mentioned is not in the current tomcat release (6.0.16).
Since I have to build/patch the tomcat for a productive environment what
whould you recommend: patch the 6.0.16 sources or build tomcat from the
newest trunk?
We've ran another test and encountered
Andrew Hole wrote:
I have both tomcat instances on the same machine, and tcpListenPort are
different on both server.xml: instance 1 setuped with 9016 and instance 2
with 9017.
When I stop one of tomcats, the other is notified properly with the
following message:
12-Feb-2008 11:19:57 org.apache.
On Feb 13, 2008 12:08 AM, Andrew Hole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 13, 2008 7:23 AM, David Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Have you tried starting with a minimal configuration and then adding
> > options as you deem necessary?
>
> What you consider the minimal configuration?
See the doc
you already asked this question, and I already answered.
http://marc.info/?l=tomcat-user&m=120290898727190&w=2
Filip
gp456 wrote:
Hello,
we have a similar problem as Raul Garcia has posted in
http://www.nabble.com/Tomcat-6---Cluster-error.-to14921385.html#a14921385
this message, but we're
[CLUSTERLOG] NioReceiver - WARN - 02/12/2008 17:34:23,895 - NioReceiver -
Channel key is registered, but has had no interest ops for the last 3000 ms.
(canc
elled:false):[EMAIL PROTECTED] last access:2008-02-12
17:34:17.957
and finally:
this message most likely indicates that the thread pool hand
Maybe Dave means to just run one Tomcat instance. There is in the TC doco info
about the minimalist TC if memory serves. Since you are attempting a type of
load-balancing it would serve you well to reply with a lot more info about your
overall architecture:
OS: vendor, build version, updates (s
What you consider the minimal configuration?
On Feb 13, 2008 7:23 AM, David Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2008 10:59 AM, Andrew Hole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've the following configuration on server.xml for two different
> instances
> > of tomcat (on the same server). BUT,
On Feb 12, 2008 10:59 AM, Andrew Hole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've the following configuration on server.xml for two different instances
> of tomcat (on the same server). BUT, i don't know why, session replication
> doesn't work.
> Could you help me to find why?
Have you tried starting with a
Hi!
I have both tomcat instances on the same machine, and tcpListenPort are
different on both server.xml: instance 1 setuped with 9016 and instance 2
with 9017.
When I stop one of tomcats, the other is notified properly with the
following message:
12-Feb-2008 11:19:57 org.apache.catalina.cluster
Dumb question: is everything supposed to be defined on the same IP (loopback?)
and port?
Andrew Hole wrote ..
> Hello guys!
>
> I've the following configuration on server.xml for two different instances
> of tomcat (on the same server). BUT, i don't know why, session replication
> doesn't work.
Rainer,
I setup a test httpd + loadbalancer with jk 1.2.24 and could reproduce
the problem over and over again. Then I patched the source and have
been unable to reproduce the problem with the patched mod_jk.so.
So the patch looks good.
Regards
Ben
On 8/1/07, ben short <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
I'll give it ago first thing tomorrow, well after a cup of tea :)
On 8/1/07, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi Ben,
>
> could you try the following patch for 1.2.24:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rjung/mod_jk-dev/patches/fail-on-status.patch
>
> I guess you can build the module yourself
hi Ben,
could you try the following patch for 1.2.24:
http://people.apache.org/~rjung/mod_jk-dev/patches/fail-on-status.patch
I guess you can build the module yourself (it's easy: configure
--with-apxs=PATHTOAPXS; make; make install). Now simply download the
source of 1.2.24 and use the patch
Sure for stable operation, but what if the machine reboots, tomcat
starts up and your webapp doesn't for some reason. This situation
could occur then.
Many thanks for your help with this one.
Regards
Ben
On 8/1/07, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> I think I understand the pr
Hi Ben,
I think I understand the problem now, and it is a jk bug. For stable
operation you should really use the disable/stop feature. Nevertheless
I'm starting thinking about how to fix this in a good way.
The bug has to do with the new "fail on status" feature you use. It is
not very old,
>> Is length 1090 correct?`So does the full body have that length?
Yes firefox reports that the page is 1k in size, via the web
developer's tool bar. I have seen it happen in IE 6 and 7 also.
Would it be possible for me to email you directly the output of
wireshark for both one bad and one good a
ben short wrote:
Ok I have used wireshark and see that the request is sent to the
apache httpd. The next first packet i get back contains the
following...
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:57:25 GMT
Server: Apache/2.2.4 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.4 OpenSSL/0.9.7a mod_jk/1.2.23
Content-Length: 10
Ok I have used wireshark and see that the request is sent to the
apache httpd. The next first packet i get back contains the
following...
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:57:25 GMT
Server: Apache/2.2.4 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.4 OpenSSL/0.9.7a mod_jk/1.2.23
Content-Length: 1090 ***NOTE every
You could dig deeper into two different directions:
- protocol: is the content-length in the response headers correct? Or
does it use chunked transfer, and is this OK?
- sniff the network in front of the apache: do the packets actually get
send back to the browser?
Regards,
Rainer
ben sh
I'm not getting anywhere with this :(
I have set the logging to trace for mod_jk and I can see all the
response packets. I have also turned on our applications response
logging and can see that the running webapp writes the full page to
the response. I can then see it all in the mod_jk logs. But t
ben short wrote:
I have altered the code to write out which webapp generated the page
to the html, so i can see where the partial responses are comming
from.
What I see is
I stop the webapp on box 2. I make a request and I see part of the
page. The html shows that the partial page was gener
I have altered the code to write out which webapp generated the page
to the html, so i can see where the partial responses are comming
from.
What I see is
I stop the webapp on box 2. I make a request and I see part of the
page. The html shows that the partial page was generated by the
running
Rainer,
Thanks for that. Yes we are going for a mix of both really. But I'll
run some bench marks against both sticky and none sticky to see how it
gets on.
Yes in production if we want to stop/undeploy/deploy a webapp we will
set the worker status to stopped. This issue came up as more of a what
Using sticky sessions will allow only requests without sessions to be
balanced freely. If you've either got many sessions, or your sessions
are relatively short, than load balancing will statistically still good.
Only in case of few long lasting sessions, you could experience the
problem, that
So how does setting sticky sessions to true and the default value for
the Load Balancing Directive 'method' (defaults to request) interact
then?
On 7/30/07, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apart from all the other things I wrote: don't turn off session
> stickyness, even if you use repli
Apart from all the other things I wrote: don't turn off session
stickyness, even if you use replication. Turn it off only, if you've got
a really good reason. The fact that switching the backend between
requests is possible with replication should not lead to the assumption,
that it is a good i
Hi Rainer,
By shutdown I mean I have clicked the 'stop' link on the tomcat manager page.
Im also using session replication between the two tomcats.
I have just tried turning off firefoxes cache and I see the same result.
On 7/30/07, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> I don't k
Hi Ben,
I don't know what exactly you mean by "shutdown", but mod_jk has no
memory/cache/buffer for parts or all of an earlier response. It does
buffer parts of a request for reusing it during failover, but not with
responses and not between different requests.
If the webapp is not available
Kristian Rink wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Folks;
still all along considering switching our application environment to
tomcat6, I wonder whether there is a meaningful way of deploying a web
application to multiple tomcats / a tomcat cluster using maven2?
FarmWarDeployer
It works, thank you very much Peter.
I just can't figure why? It's tricky. Anyway, it works.
HoTszKin
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Rossbach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List"
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 12:41 AM
Subject: Re: To
0 U 0
00 lo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]# exit
Script done on Thu 26 Oct 2006 03:42:43 PM CST
Any suggestion?
HoTszKin
- Original Message - From: "Peter Rossbach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List"
Sent: Thursday, October 26,
3 PM CST
Any suggestion?
HoTszKin
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Rossbach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List"
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 2:00 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat Cluster problem. skipping state transfer. No members
active in clu
I think you have a network routing problem.
Read the cluster help: http://tomcat.apache.org/faq/cluster.html
Regards
Peter
Am 25.10.2006 um 06:20 schrieb hotszkin:
I am trying to setup a tomcat cluster as told in the tomcat cluster
document. There are 3 PCs in my environment. All of them
It means only one of the two tomcats has a context named /edac. You need to
either deploy the edac.war on the 2nd tomcat, or use the farm deployer
feature of the cluster.
Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: Ralf Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 6:29 PM
it means that server-A has the webapp /edac but server-B doesn't. and
server B is receiving messages, and ignoring them
doesn't mean its an error, only if you expect both servers to have the
webapp. This is not the case if one server is starting up and has not
deployed the app yet
Filip
Ralf S
talk to your operations team or sys admins, in conjunction you will come
up with a solution that works for you.
ie, you can deploy the webapp in a shared directory on the san, and have
all tomcats read it from there, its up to you
FM wrote:
Hello everybody,
Next month, we'll have 6 servers co
We mark all SessionID with a node marker!
Setup with
The mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp make then the correct routing.
The algo extract the worker name from cookie or url rewrite
parameter jsessionid.
Read Cluster Doc and mod:jk doc
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/cluster-howto.html
90 matches
Mail list logo
