RE: Small connection problems with JK 1.2.15 and IIS 5

2006-02-08 Thread Paul Hamer
From: Paul Hamer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, 08 February, 2006 13:23 > To: users@tomcat.apache.org > Subject: RE: Small connection problems with JK 1.2.15 and IIS 5 > > Hi, > > I experienced the same problem as described earlier in this > thread. I'm als

RE: Small connection problems with JK 1.2.15 and IIS 5

2006-02-08 Thread Paul Hamer
Hi, I experienced the same problem as described earlier in this thread. I'm also using Tomcat 5.5 (5.5.15 to be exact), JK 1.2.15 and IIS 5 (Win2k server). I'm running a single Tomcat instance, and it's on the same server as IIS. I was also having these messages, really thousands every day:

RE: Small connection problems with JK 1.2.15 and IIS 5

2006-01-13 Thread br1
> Why do you have 30 workers? > The worker should reflect a physical connection to the backend server. > It would only make sense if you'd have 30 Tomcats behing. Yes, I do, that's why I was asking.. :-) > It depends on your client load, but I would say that 200 is more > then enough for a singl

Re: Small connection problems with JK 1.2.15 and IIS 5

2006-01-13 Thread Mladen Turk
myrealbruno wrote: > Sorry - the message was cut for some reason. > I was also saying that one that decides to use XP Pro for a production machine should be shot (and you could reply that everyone > that decides to use Windows should be shot :-) > In the end I was only suggesting a global setti

RE: Small connection problems with JK 1.2.15 and IIS 5

2006-01-13 Thread br1
So one shouldn't be able to put more then 1 worker because on WinXP it is not supported..? :-) I was talking about a server version infact.. more than 20 connections, etc - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: Small connection problems with JK 1.2.15 and IIS 5

2006-01-13 Thread Mladen Turk
br1 wrote: Mladen, Thank you very much for your reply. I didn't catch cachesize relates to concurrent users, in this case I will have to change a lot of workers. So I assume that there are (currently) no recommendations regarding a maximum total worker.cachesize for a single IIS5 server, corr

RE: Small connection problems with JK 1.2.15 and IIS 5

2006-01-13 Thread br1
nt: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 5:29 PM Subject: Re: Small connection problems with JK 1.2.15 and IIS 5 > br1 wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I am new to the list but I must say I used it a lot to find things in the > > past years. > > This time I am facing a problem

Re: Small connection problems with JK 1.2.15 and IIS 5

2006-01-11 Thread Mladen Turk
br1 wrote: Hello, I am new to the list but I must say I used it a lot to find things in the past years. This time I am facing a problem or two but not finding a solution.. small problems luckily. (2) [Fri Jan 06 15:17:20 2006] [warn] jk_ajp_common.c (2138): Unable to get the free endpoint f