-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Andrew Hole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:
>> Session affinity
>>
>> Is not very smart... There is some problem with that?
>
> I think so - without some intelligence
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Andrew Hole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: Session affinity
>>
>> Is not very smart... There is some problem with that?
>
> I think so - without some intelligence in the load balancer, I don't think
> From: Andrew Hole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Session affinity
>
> Is not very smart... There is some problem with that?
I think so - without some intelligence in the load balancer, I don't think you
can maintain session affinity.
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNIC
Is not very smart... There is some problem with that?
Thanks
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Caldarale, Charles R <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Andrew Hole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Session affinity
> >
> > How it works when we have an hardware load balancer in the
> > firs
> From: Andrew Hole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Session affinity
>
> How it works when we have an hardware load balancer in the
> first layer and 2 actives Apache HTTP Server?
How smart is your load balancer? Can it be configured to route requests based
on content of the HTTP message (i
Fantastic! Thanks for the clarification.
On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:17:17 -0600, Tim Lucia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Rob Bugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 3:22 PM
>> To: Tomcat Users List
>&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Bugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 3:22 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Session Affinity and Session Replication
>
>
> Thanks, for the information. My confusion in part stems from this com
On 2/6/07, Rob Bugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My confusion in part stems from this comment in the The Apache
Tomcat Connector - Reference Guide,
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/workers.html
Ah, OK -- perhaps that's JK-specific. As I said, I used mod_proxy_ajp
which has no "wo
t;Sent: Feb 6, 2007 2:00 PM
>To: Tomcat Users List , Rob Bugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Session Affinity and Session Replication
>
>On 2/6/07, Rob Bugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> All the documentation I've read to date indicates not to use sticky
&g
On 2/6/07, Rob Bugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All the documentation I've read to date indicates not to use sticky
sessions and session replication together.
Can you cite where you saw that?
I've set up a similar config (using mod_proxy_ajp) with both sticky
sessions and session replication a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rob,
Rob Bugh wrote:
> So my question is, if I enable session affinity but not session
> replication, how can I failover a connection without losing the
> session data?
You can't, unless you are using some other mechanism to share that data.
Many
11 matches
Mail list logo
