Re: Problem with protecting pages in Tomcat 5.5

2008-01-24 Thread Bill Barker
"Diogenes Gomes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Thank you very much Caldarale. > > Please, do you know how to define "any role"? The framework I use > takes care of authorization (based on service's methods). I only need > to authenticate the user, otherwise I would

Re: Problem with protecting pages in Tomcat 5.5

2008-01-24 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chuck, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: |> From: Diogenes Gomes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |> Subject: Re: Problem with protecting pages in Tomcat 5.5 |> |> Please, do you know how to define "any role"? | | I don't believe the s

Re: Problem with protecting pages in Tomcat 5.5

2008-01-24 Thread David Smith
I would think the simplest way to go is to define a role and add all registered users to it. Nothing says a user can't have more than one role. --David Diogenes Gomes wrote: Thank you very much Caldarale. Please, do you know how to define "any role"? The framework I use takes care of author

RE: Problem with protecting pages in Tomcat 5.5

2008-01-24 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Diogenes Gomes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Problem with protecting pages in Tomcat 5.5 > > Please, do you know how to define "any role"? I don't believe the servlet spec allows for such a weak constraint. You may want to consider using prog

Re: Problem with protecting pages in Tomcat 5.5

2008-01-24 Thread Diogenes Gomes
Thank you very much Caldarale. Please, do you know how to define "any role"? The framework I use takes care of authorization (based on service's methods). I only need to authenticate the user, otherwise I would double the access configuration. Diogenes 2008/1/24, Caldarale, Charles R <[EMAIL PRO

RE: Problem with protecting pages in Tomcat 5.5

2008-01-24 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Diogenes Gomes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Problem with protecting pages in Tomcat 5.5 > > > * > IIRC, 5.0 misinterpreted a setting of *; this was corrected in 5.5 and above. The asterisk does not mean "any role", but rather