> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> Subject: Re: Missing files for mod_jk
>
> And why is this thread entitled "Missing files for mod_jk" ?
> Did we hijack something ?
No, that was the OP's original subject line, where he apparently misinterpreted
And why is this thread entitled "Missing files for mod_jk" ?
Did we hijack something ?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Alexander Diedler [mailto:adied...@tecracer.de]
Subject: AW: Missing files for mod_jk
Sorry, it is 1024 KB, sure, just to fast tipped into the keyboard.
So again, why did you change it from the default?
worker.list= worker3,loadbalancer,jkstatus
I see no d
> From: Alexander Diedler [mailto:adied...@tecracer.de]
> Subject: AW: Missing files for mod_jk
>
> Sorry, it is 1024 KB, sure, just to fast tipped into the keyboard.
So again, why did you change it from the default?
> worker.list= worker3,loadbalancer,jkstatus
I see no declarations for worker3
> From: Alexander Diedler [mailto:adied...@tecracer.de]
> Subject: AW: Missing files for mod_jk
> Thread stack size : 1024 MB
That's a problem - or a typo. A 1 GB thread stack size is not possible.
Assuming you meant 1024 KB, why did you think it necessary to change it from
the default?
Use
> From: Alexander Diedler [mailto:adied...@tecracer.de]
> Subject: AW: Missing files for mod_jk
>
> Some additional information.. in Cataling Log we can see:
> SCHWERWIEGEND: Error allocating socket processor
> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread
This is not a heap usag
