On 1/30/2013 3:27 PM, Jeff Sturm wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Williams, Nick [mailto:nicholas.willi...@ul.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 2:06 PM
I'm curious. I know that, being open source, the Tomcat project generally
welcomes
volunteers who want to contribute features or im
: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 2:18 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: JMS in a Tomcat Environment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Nick,
On 1/30/13 2:06 PM, Williams, Nick wrote:
> Thanks for the input, both of you. I will take a look at the activity
> in the repository and also i
> -Original Message-
> From: Williams, Nick [mailto:nicholas.willi...@ul.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 2:06 PM
>
> I'm curious. I know that, being open source, the Tomcat project generally
> welcomes
> volunteers who want to contribute features or improvements. However, I'd lik
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Nick,
On 1/30/13 2:06 PM, Williams, Nick wrote:
> Thanks for the input, both of you. I will take a look at the
> activity in the repository and also inquire on the lists, as well
> as trying different implementations.
>
> I'm curious. I know that,
mailing list.
Dan
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nick
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Mikusa [mailto:dmik...@vmware.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 11:41 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: JMS in a Tomcat Environment
>
> On Jan 30, 2013, at 11:20
nks,
>
> Nick
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Mikusa [mailto:dmik...@vmware.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 11:41 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: JMS in a Tomcat Environment
>
> On Jan 30, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Williams, Nick wrote:
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Nick,
On 1/30/13 1:08 PM, Williams, Nick wrote:
> I do not have a preferred implementation, no. I understand the
> basics of JMS and how it works, but I have never actually used it
> before. I do usually work with Spring Framework, but my
> understa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Nick,
On 1/30/13 11:20 AM, Williams, Nick wrote:
> Knowing that Tomcat is not a full JavaEE application server, I
> understand that it doesn't support all JavaEE specifications, and
> that JMS is one of the specifications that Tomcat does not
> im
w well-maintained and up-to-date is
ActiveMQ? Can we expect work on the impending JMS 2.0 specification to begin
any time in the future?
Thanks,
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Mikusa [mailto:dmik...@vmware.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 11:41 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subjec
On Jan 30, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Williams, Nick wrote:
> Knowing that Tomcat is not a full JavaEE application server, I understand
> that it doesn't support all JavaEE specifications, and that JMS is one of the
> specifications that Tomcat does not implement. However, I'm wondering if any
> Tomcat
10 matches
Mail list logo