Re: I have a problem with Apache, Tomcat

2009-05-06 Thread nohacks
Thanks for all of your time on this problem. I found the issue..!!! It was a page caching issue with the browser. It seems the page was cached and so not creating a new session for the Post button on Login. I put the following in my login page and now it works great. The new session is create

Re: I have a problem with Apache, Tomcat

2009-05-06 Thread Rainer Jung
On 05.05.2009 22:17, nohacks wrote: > 1) Which component should respond to this request, Apache or Tomcat? > > Tomcat should answer all. I am not using Apache to server any Static > content. OK, and I assume you actually checked, that it *is* Tomcat that produces the answer in the 404 case. I fo

Re: I have a problem with Apache, Tomcat

2009-05-05 Thread André Warnier
Pid wrote: nohacks wrote: Apache has better Security and Load balancing for the tomcat cluster. I'm passing out hard hats & sandbags for anyone who wants one. Do you also have some flame-retardant and anti-troll spells (or dwarfs) in your inventory ? ---

Re: I have a problem with Apache, Tomcat

2009-05-05 Thread André Warnier
Caldarale, Charles R wrote: From: nohacks [mailto:philipfwil...@gmail.com] Subject: Re: I have a problem with Apache, Tomcat I am not using Apache to server any Static content. That begs the question: why do you have httpd in the game at all? I knew you'd say that, I was about to d

Re: I have a problem with Apache, Tomcat

2009-05-05 Thread Pid
nohacks wrote: > Apache has better Security and Load balancing for the tomcat cluster. I'm passing out hard hats & sandbags for anyone who wants one. p > Phil > > > Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >>> From: nohacks [mailto:philipfwil...@gmail.com] >>>

RE: I have a problem with Apache, Tomcat

2009-05-05 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: nohacks [mailto:philipfwil...@gmail.com] > Subject: RE: I have a problem with Apache, Tomcat > > Apache has better Security and Load balancing for the tomcat cluster. Security, no. Load balancing, yes - if you can't afford a real one. - Chuck THIS COMMUNIC

RE: I have a problem with Apache, Tomcat

2009-05-05 Thread nohacks
Apache has better Security and Load balancing for the tomcat cluster. Phil Caldarale, Charles R wrote: > >> From: nohacks [mailto:philipfwil...@gmail.com] >> Subject: Re: I have a problem with Apache, Tomcat >> >> I am not using Apache to server any Static

RE: I have a problem with Apache, Tomcat

2009-05-05 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: nohacks [mailto:philipfwil...@gmail.com] > Subject: Re: I have a problem with Apache, Tomcat > > I am not using Apache to server any Static content. That begs the question: why do you have httpd in the game at all? - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/

Re: I have a problem with Apache, Tomcat

2009-05-05 Thread nohacks
Hi Rainer, Thanks very much for your responses. I have your answers below. 1) Which component should respond to this request, Apache or Tomcat? Tomcat should answer all. I am not using Apache to server any Static content. 2)Which part of your webapps is expected to serve the content for Tomc

Re: I have a problem with Apache, Tomcat

2009-05-05 Thread Rainer Jung
On 05.05.2009 16:12, nohacks wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Thanks for your feedback with this issue. This has been making me crazy for > such a long time. > > I have put this in last night and tested. > > > JkMount /*.jsp loadbalancer > JkMount /*.jsf loadbalancer > JkMount

Re: I have a problem with Apache, Tomcat

2009-05-05 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Phil, On 5/5/2009 10:12 AM, nohacks wrote: > I have put this in last night and tested. > > > JkMount /*.jsp loadbalancer > JkMount /*.jsf loadbalancer > JkMount /* loadbalancer > JkMount /servlet/* loadbalancer >

Re: I have a problem with Apache, Tomcat

2009-05-05 Thread nohacks
Hi Guys, Thanks for your feedback with this issue. This has been making me crazy for such a long time. I have put this in last night and tested. JkMount /*.jsp loadbalancer JkMount /*.jsf loadbalancer JkMount /* loadbalancer JkMount /servlet/* loadbalancer

Re: I have a problem with Apache, Tomcat

2009-05-04 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 André, On 5/4/2009 1:50 PM, André Warnier wrote: > I was not quite convinced by Chris's explanation, so I tested this by > myself. [snip] > So, despite my initial scepticism (for which I apologise), Chris turns > out to be right. Sometimes it's goo

Re: I have a problem with Apache, Tomcat

2009-05-04 Thread Rainer Jung
On 04.05.2009 19:50, André Warnier wrote: > Hi Chris too, and hi nohacks. > > I was not quite convinced by Chris's explanation, so I tested this by > myself. > Apache httpd 2.2.3 > mod_jk 1.2.18 (quite old) > Tomcat 5.5.27 > > In my case, URI's starting with /starweb are being redirected to Tomc

Re: I have a problem with Apache, Tomcat

2009-05-04 Thread André Warnier
Hi Chris too, and hi nohacks. I was not quite convinced by Chris's explanation, so I tested this by myself. Apache httpd 2.2.3 mod_jk 1.2.18 (quite old) Tomcat 5.5.27 In my case, URI's starting with /starweb are being redirected to Tomcat by mod_jk (corresponding to the OP's case "/myapp").

Re: I have a problem with Apache, Tomcat

2009-05-04 Thread nohacks
Hi Chris, I downloaded the new version of mod_jk http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/linux/jk-1.2.28/i586/ [ ] mod_jk-1.2.28-httpd-2.2.X.so 21-Mar-2009 23:53 676K I am still having the same issues as you can see... Any ideal what

Re: I have a problem with Apache, Tomcat

2009-05-02 Thread nohacks
Hi Chris, Thanks for your reply. I have JkStripSession on and still having the issue. Any help is really appreciated. I have had this issues for a long time now and it is a Huge Issue for us !! This is my httpd.conf file. == LoadModule jk_module /usr/lib/apach

Re: I have a problem with Apache, Tomcat

2009-05-01 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nohacks, On 4/30/2009 4:18 PM, nohacks wrote: > You can see from my logs that apache returns a 200 for my login page then > returns a 404 from > > It seems to be an issue now and then. It works for a while then it tosses a > 404. Maybe after a timeou