Re: AJP communication failures

2012-05-30 Thread Brett Delle Grazie
On 30 May 2012 16:01, André Warnier wrote: > Roney Duilio Stein wrote: >> >> Hello Warnier, >> >> The "disablereuse=On" just made things worse, maybe due to the high >> frequency/quantity of opened connections. >> I'll look on the possibility to disable the MS NLB. >> > According to my superficial

Re: AJP communication failures

2012-05-30 Thread André Warnier
Roney Duilio Stein wrote: Hello Warnier, The "disablereuse=On" just made things worse, maybe due to the high frequency/quantity of opened connections. I'll look on the possibility to disable the MS NLB. According to my superficial reading of a couple of MS KB pages about the NLB, it should be

RE: AJP communication failures

2012-05-30 Thread Roney Duilio Stein
Hello Warnier, The "disablereuse=On" just made things worse, maybe due to the high frequency/quantity of opened connections. I'll look on the possibility to disable the MS NLB. Thanks, Roney - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-un

Re: AJP communication failures

2012-05-30 Thread André Warnier
Hi. Thank you for all the very detailed information provided. From what I can see in the logs, at this point I would have to say that my impression is that this is a problem buried fairly deep in the TCP/IP stack, and both Apache+mod_proxy_ajp, and Tomcat, may just be suffering the consequence

RE: AJP communication failures

2012-05-29 Thread Roney Duilio Stein
I forgot to mention that these errors are infrequent, 6 per day on average. Usually everything works fine, sometimes these errors happens and put the worker in error state. However, system load is still very low. Thanks, Roney -Original Message- From: Roney Duilio Stein [mailto:roney.s