Chuck, Darryl
I'd like to thank you both on the amazing insights of concurrency.
Learned a lot today :-)
thanx
leon
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: Darryl L. Miles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OT] Performance tricks with multiple tomcat instances
>
> I had read some comments that might lead others to think
> that "count++" on a java "int" type is in some way atomic.
Yes, there ar
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Darryl L. Miles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Performance tricks with multiple tomcat instances
I would hope that JIT compiler engineers would as a minimum
implicitly add the "lock" instruction before all operations
on primitive types declared volati
> From: Darryl L. Miles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Performance tricks with multiple tomcat instances
>
> I would hope that JIT compiler engineers would as a minimum
> implicitly add the "lock" instruction before all operations
> on primitive types declared volatile that are in the
