Re: Odd NIO connector behavior

2012-02-23 Thread Matthew Tyson
Just a heads up to the Tomcat team - I switched all our comet handling to Jetty, and these issues are resolved. Something is definitely amiss in the NIO connector. Regards, Matt Tyson On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 31/12/2011 16:35, Matthew Tyson wrote: > > On Wed,

Re: Odd NIO connector behavior

2011-12-31 Thread Mark Thomas
On 31/12/2011 16:35, Matthew Tyson wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 1:04 AM, wrote: > >> Matthew Tyson wrote: >> >>> That's right, there is an f5 load balancer. The valve is used to keep >>> track of whether the request was via HTTPS or not. >> >> What happens if you go direct to Tomcat and byp

Re: Odd NIO connector behavior

2011-12-31 Thread Matthew Tyson
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 1:04 AM, wrote: > Matthew Tyson wrote: > > >That's right, there is an f5 load balancer. The valve is used to keep > >track of whether the request was via HTTPS or not. > > What happens if you go direct to Tomcat and bypass the F5? > > >tcpdump seems to confirm the same.

Re: Odd NIO connector behavior

2011-12-31 Thread Pid
On 29/12/2011 19:22, Matthew Tyson wrote: > On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Pid wrote: > >> On 29/12/2011 17:27, Matthew Tyson wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Matthew Tyson >>> wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Stefan Mayr >> wrote: > Am 28.12.2011 10:04, sch

Re: Odd NIO connector behavior

2011-12-29 Thread Matthew Tyson
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Tim Watts wrote: > On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 11:22 -0800, Matthew Tyson wrote: > > > > > How an empty 200 response could be generated > > without executing the logging statement here is a mystery. > > > > Do you still have that MonitoringFilter configured in the web

Re: Odd NIO connector behavior

2011-12-29 Thread Tim Watts
On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 11:22 -0800, Matthew Tyson wrote: > How an empty 200 response could be generated > without executing the logging statement here is a mystery. > Do you still have that MonitoringFilter configured in the web app? Perhaps it is short circuiting the chain. > protected void

Re: Odd NIO connector behavior

2011-12-29 Thread Pid
On 29/12/2011 17:27, Matthew Tyson wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Matthew Tyson > wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Stefan Mayr wrote: >> >>> Am 28.12.2011 10:04, schrieb ma...@apache.org: >>> >>> Matthew Tyson> wrote: That's right, there is an f5 load balan

Re: Odd NIO connector behavior

2011-12-29 Thread Matthew Tyson
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Pid wrote: > On 29/12/2011 17:27, Matthew Tyson wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Matthew Tyson > > wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Stefan Mayr >wrote: > >> > >>> Am 28.12.2011 10:04, schrieb ma...@apache.org: > >>> > >>> Matthew Tyso

Re: Odd NIO connector behavior

2011-12-29 Thread Matthew Tyson
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Matthew Tyson wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Stefan Mayr wrote: > >> Am 28.12.2011 10:04, schrieb ma...@apache.org: >> >> Matthew Tyson> >>> wrote: >>> >>> That's right, there is an f5 load balancer. The valve is used to keep track of whether th

Re: Odd NIO connector behavior

2011-12-28 Thread Matthew Tyson
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Stefan Mayr wrote: > Am 28.12.2011 10:04, schrieb ma...@apache.org: > > Matthew Tyson> >> wrote: >> >> That's right, there is an f5 load balancer. The valve is used to keep >>> track of whether the request was via HTTPS or not. >>> >> >> What happens if you go

Re: Odd NIO connector behavior

2011-12-28 Thread Stefan Mayr
Am 28.12.2011 10:04, schrieb ma...@apache.org: Matthew Tyson wrote: That's right, there is an f5 load balancer. The valve is used to keep track of whether the request was via HTTPS or not. What happens if you go direct to Tomcat and bypass the F5? tcpdump seems to confirm the same. What

Re: Odd NIO connector behavior

2011-12-28 Thread markt
Matthew Tyson wrote: >That's right, there is an f5 load balancer. The valve is used to keep >track of whether the request was via HTTPS or not. What happens if you go direct to Tomcat and bypass the F5? >tcpdump seems to confirm the same. What are you thinking? Probably, like me, that the F5

Re: Odd NIO connector behavior

2011-12-27 Thread Matthew Tyson
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Stefan Mayr wrote: > Am 24.12.2011 00:39, schrieb Matthew Tyson: > > Hello, >> >> We have been having quite a few problems with using long-polling >> connections in Tomcat, via the NIO connector. Upgrading to Tomcat 7.0.23 >> definitely improved things, but we a

Re: Odd NIO connector behavior

2011-12-27 Thread Stefan Mayr
Am 24.12.2011 00:39, schrieb Matthew Tyson: Hello, We have been having quite a few problems with using long-polling connections in Tomcat, via the NIO connector. Upgrading to Tomcat 7.0.23 definitely improved things, but we are still seeing major issues. The problems only crop up after a coupl

Re: Odd NIO connector behavior

2011-12-27 Thread Matthew Tyson
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 25/12/2011 02:17, Matthew Tyson wrote: > > >> INFO 2011-12-24 10:25:35,578 COMET REQUEST: 75.149.42.46 POST null | > >> TRACE: > >> java.lang.Throwable > >> at > org.cometd.server.CometdServlet.service(CometdServlet.java:149) >

Re: Odd NIO connector behavior

2011-12-27 Thread Mark Thomas
On 25/12/2011 02:17, Matthew Tyson wrote: >> INFO 2011-12-24 10:25:35,578 COMET REQUEST: 75.149.42.46 POST null | >> TRACE: >> java.lang.Throwable >> at org.cometd.server.CometdServlet.service(CometdServlet.java:149) >> at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java

Re: Odd NIO connector behavior

2011-12-25 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2011/12/25 Matthew Tyson : > On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Matthew Tyson > wrote: > >> On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> >>> On 23/12/2011 23:39, Matthew Tyson wrote: >>> > Hello, >>> > >>> > We have been having quite a few problems with using long-polling >>> > connection

Re: Odd NIO connector behavior

2011-12-24 Thread Matthew Tyson
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Matthew Tyson wrote: > On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > >> On 23/12/2011 23:39, Matthew Tyson wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > We have been having quite a few problems with using long-polling >> > connections in Tomcat, via the NIO connector. Up

Re: Odd NIO connector behavior

2011-12-24 Thread Stefan Mayr
Am 24.12.2011 19:33, schrieb Matthew Tyson: On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 23/12/2011 23:39, Matthew Tyson wrote: Hello, We have been having quite a few problems with using long-polling connections in Tomcat, via the NIO connector. Upgrading to Tomcat 7.0.23 definite

Re: Odd NIO connector behavior

2011-12-24 Thread Matthew Tyson
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 23/12/2011 23:39, Matthew Tyson wrote: > > Hello, > > > > We have been having quite a few problems with using long-polling > > connections in Tomcat, via the NIO connector. Upgrading to Tomcat 7.0.23 > > definitely improved things, but we

Re: Odd NIO connector behavior

2011-12-24 Thread Mark Thomas
On 23/12/2011 23:39, Matthew Tyson wrote: > Hello, > > We have been having quite a few problems with using long-polling > connections in Tomcat, via the NIO connector. Upgrading to Tomcat 7.0.23 > definitely improved things, but we are still seeing major issues. Glad to hear things are getting b

Odd NIO connector behavior

2011-12-23 Thread Matthew Tyson
Hello, We have been having quite a few problems with using long-polling connections in Tomcat, via the NIO connector. Upgrading to Tomcat 7.0.23 definitely improved things, but we are still seeing major issues. The problems only crop up after a couple minutes under some load (modest load, around