Re: Mod_JK on OSX server 10.5

2008-04-10 Thread CommonGround Softworks/Phil McNamara
Hi Rainier, >CommonGround Softworks/Phil McNamara schrieb: >> Hi Folks, >> Wondered if someone could help me with ideas on this? >> >> Have a configuration where a separate tomcat instance is installed (So >> apple can't break it :)). Apple's copy of tomcat provided with the >> machine in not r

Re: Mod_JK on OSX server 10.5

2008-04-10 Thread Rainer Jung
CommonGround Softworks/Phil McNamara schrieb: Hi Folks, Wondered if someone could help me with ideas on this? Have a configuration where a separate tomcat instance is installed (So apple can't break it :)). Apple's copy of tomcat provided with the machine in not running. The new Tomcat (5.5.7)

RE: Mod_JK on OSX server 10.5

2008-04-10 Thread CommonGround Softworks/Phil McNamara
>> From: CommonGround Softworks/Phil McNamara >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: RE: Mod_JK on OSX server 10.5 >> >> Thanks. I found this: >> http://commons-daemon.darwinports.com/ > >Why not look at the real doc? >http://commons.apache.or

RE: Mod_JK on OSX server 10.5

2008-04-09 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: CommonGround Softworks/Phil McNamara > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Mod_JK on OSX server 10.5 > > Thanks. I found this: > http://commons-daemon.darwinports.com/ Why not look at the real doc? http://commons.apache.org/daemon/ - Chuck THIS COMMUNI

RE: Mod_JK on OSX server 10.5

2008-04-09 Thread CommonGround Softworks/Phil McNamara
>> From: CommonGround Softworks/Phil McNamara >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: RE: Mod_JK on OSX server 10.5 >> >> In OSX, IIRC, there were the usual issues because >> the ports less than 1024 are reserved for priviledged >> services > &g

RE: Mod_JK on OSX server 10.5

2008-04-09 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: CommonGround Softworks/Phil McNamara > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Mod_JK on OSX server 10.5 > > In OSX, IIRC, there were the usual issues because > the ports less than 1024 are reserved for priviledged > services Which is exactly why jsvc (now

RE: Mod_JK on OSX server 10.5

2008-04-09 Thread CommonGround Softworks/Phil McNamara
>> From: CommonGround Softworks/Phil McNamara >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Mod_JK on OSX server 10.5 >> >> The new Tomcat (5.5.7) plays fine on port 8080. > >Why are you using such an old level? That's nearly three years old. > >>

RE: Mod_JK on OSX server 10.5

2008-04-09 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: CommonGround Softworks/Phil McNamara > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Mod_JK on OSX server 10.5 > > The new Tomcat (5.5.7) plays fine on port 8080. Why are you using such an old level? That's nearly three years old. > We want to move to using apache

Mod_JK on OSX server 10.5

2008-04-08 Thread CommonGround Softworks/Phil McNamara
Hi Folks, Wondered if someone could help me with ideas on this? Have a configuration where a separate tomcat instance is installed (So apple can't break it :)). Apple's copy of tomcat provided with the machine in not running. The new Tomcat (5.5.7) plays fine on port 8080. i.e. http://localhos