On 06/11/2016 11:24, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote:
> On 04.11.2016 20:06, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> I did say "patches welcome" to André but since he is a committer that
>> should have been "commits welcome" ;)
>>
>
> Guys, you all know my level of (in)competence in matters deeply Java.
You might
On 04.11.2016 20:06, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 04/11/2016 15:53, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org] Subject: Re:
MaxInactiveInterval
On 04/11/2016 15:07, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote:
A log message in an application running under Tomcat 8 mentions
the
On 04/11/2016 15:53, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org] Subject: Re:
>> MaxInactiveInterval
>
>> On 04/11/2016 15:07, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote:
>>> A log message in an application running under Tomcat 8 mentions
>>
> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
> Subject: Re: MaxInactiveInterval
> On 04/11/2016 15:07, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote:
> > A log message in an application running under Tomcat 8 mentions the
> > "MaxInactiveInterval" setting, saying that it is a bit
On 04/11/2016 15:07, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote:
> Hi.
>
> A log message in an application running under Tomcat 8 mentions the
> "MaxInactiveInterval" setting, saying that it is a bit short..
>
> The only place in the Tomcat 8 documentation where I find t
Hi.
A log message in an application running under Tomcat 8 mentions the "MaxInactiveInterval"
setting, saying that it is a bit short..
The only place in the Tomcat 8 documentation where I find this setting, is in
https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-8.0-doc/config/manager.html
where it
On 21/06/2016 03:54, mw...@loftware.com wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 11:32 AM
>> To: Tomcat Users List
>> Subject: Re: session-timeout and maxInactiveInterval
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 11:32 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: session-timeout and maxInactiveInterval
>
> On 20/06/2016 16:00, mw...@loftware.com wrote:
> > We are runni
ssion-timeout if it is not explicitly set, and if so, is not handling
> the session-timeout = 0 case specially. It also looks like
> maxInactiveInterval is really controlling the lifetime of the session.
> But I have also not been through the Tomcat code often, so I am not
> 100% sure
maxInactiveInterval is
really controlling the lifetime of the session. But I have also not been
through the Tomcat code often, so I am not 100% sure I'm looking in the right
spot.
Has anyone seen this issue before? Am I misinterpreting something?
Thanks,
Mark
> From: Lynn Hollerman [mailto:gmh2...@louisiana.edu]
> Subject: session-timeout vs. maxInactiveInterval
>
> I have been looking around the Net for information about
> the items in the subject and tomcat; it appears that they
> are actually the same thing
Pretty much. The
#x27;s web.xml or an application's web.xml and the
"maxInactiveInterval" attribute of in the context.xml file for
a particular application? Are these values interchangable, or does one
supercede the other?
Thanks!
--
Lynn Hollerman.
Office of Information Systems
University of
12 matches
Mail list logo