Re: [OT] Re: Lucene and DB speeds

2007-03-01 Thread Sriram Narayanan
On 3/1/07, Christopher Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sriram, 400MB is not really that big of an index. A friend of mine runs a Lucene index at the US Library of Congress that is several GB and they search it /very/ quickly. Of course, they have

Re: [OT] Re: Lucene and DB speeds

2007-03-01 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sriram, >> When I query for large datasets, I see a delay between the search and >> the results. For e.g., if I were to query a database containing about >> 2 GB of data, with a 400+ MB Licene index, then I get search results >> after anywhere between

[OT] Re: Lucene and DB speeds

2007-03-01 Thread Tim Funk
A common way is to add timers around the commands and then using a logging library to output those times (under info, debug, or trace) You'll probably get more help from the lucene user list -Tim Sriram Narayanan wrote: Hi all: When I query for large datasets, I see a delay between the searc

Lucene and DB speeds

2007-03-01 Thread Sriram Narayanan
Hi all: When I query for large datasets, I see a delay between the search and the results. For e.g., if I were to query a database containing about 2 GB of data, with a 400+ MB Licene index, then I get search results after anywhere between 5 seconds to 35 seconds. Any tips on how I could test fo